ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Code-Red: a case study on the spread and victims of an internet worm
Full text PdfPdf (1.11 MB)
Source Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment table of contents
Marseille, France
SESSION: Session 9: traffic analysis table of contents
Pages: 273 - 284  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-603-X
Authors
David Moore  CAIDA, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego
Colleen Shannon  CAIDA, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego
k claffy  CAIDA, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 145,   Citation Count: 93
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/637201.637244
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

On July 19, 2001, more than 359,000 computers connected to the Internet were infected with the Code-Red (CRv2) worm in less than 14 hours. The cost of this epidemic, including subsequent strains of Code-Red, is estimated to be in excess of $2.6 billion. Despite the global damage caused by this attack, there have been few serious attempts to characterize the spread of the worm, partly due to the challenge of collecting global information about worms. Using a technique that enables global detection of worm spread, we collected and analyzed data over a period of 45 days beginning July 2nd, 2001 to determine the characteristics of the spread of Code-Red throughout the Internet.In this paper, we describe the methodology we use to trace the spread of Code-Red, and then describe the results of our trace analyses. We first detail the spread of the Code-Red and CodeRedII worms in terms of infection and deactivation rates. Even without being optimized for spread of infection, Code-Red infection rates peaked at over 2,000 hosts per minute. We then examine the properties of the infected host population, including geographic location, weekly and diurnal time effects, top-level domains, and ISPs. We demonstrate that the worm was an international event, infection activity exhibited time-of-day effects, and found that, although most attention focused on large corporations, the Code-Red worm primarily preyed upon home and small business users. We also qualified the effects of DHCP on measurements of infected hosts and determined that IP addresses are not an accurate measure of the spread of a worm on timescales longer than 24 hours. Finally, the experience of the Code-Red worm demonstrates that wide-spread vulnerabilities in Internet hosts can be exploited quickly and dramatically, and that techniques other than host patching are required to mitigate Internet worms.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Spafford, "The internet worm: Crisis and aftermath," 1989.
 
2
Charles Schmidt and Tom Darby, "The Morris Internet Worm," Tech. Rep., http://www.software.com.pl/newarchive/misc/Worm/darbyt/pages/history.html.
3
 
4
CERT Coordination Center, "CERT Advisory CA-1989-04 WANK Worm On SPAN Network," http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1989-04.html.
 
5
Max Vision, "Ramen Internet Worm Analysis," http://www.whitehats.com/library/worms/ramen/.
 
6
SANS Global Incident Analysis Center, "Lion Worm," http://www.sans.org/y2k/lion.htm.
 
7
Computer Economics, "2001 economic impact of malicious code attacks," http://www.computereconomics.com/cei/press/pr92101.html.
 
8
eEye Digital Security, "Advisories and Alerts: AD20010618," http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AD20010618.html.
 
9
Microsoft, "A Very Real and Present Threat to the Internet," http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/topics/codealrt.asp.
 
10
eEye Digital Security, "Advisories and Alerts: .ida "Code Red" Worm," July 2001, http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AL20010717.html.
 
11
Silicon Defense, "Code Red Analysis page," http://www.silicondefense.com/cr/.
 
12
Cisco Systems, Inc, "Cisco Security Advisory: "Code Red" Worm - Customer Impact," http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-code-red-worm-pub.shtml.
 
13
eEye Digital Security, "CodeRedlI Worm Analysis," August 2001, http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Advisories/AL20010804.html.
 
14
SecurityFocus, "SecurityFocus Code Red II Information Headquarters," http://aris.securityfocus.com/alerts/codered2/.
 
15
"Cisco NetFlow," http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/732/netflow/.
 
16
 
17
eEye Digital Security, "eEye Code Red analysis, commented disassembly, full IDA database, and binary of the worm;" http://www.eeye.com/html/advisories/codered.zip.
 
18
Ixiacom IxMapping, "Ixmapping," http://www.ipmapper.com.
 
19
David Moore, Geoffrey M. Voelker, and Stefan Savage, "Inferring Internet Denial-of-Service Activity," Usenix Security Symposium, 2001.
 
20
Dug Song and Rob Malan and Robert Stone, "A Snapshot of Global Internet Worm Activity," http://research.arbor.net/up_media/up_files/snapshot_worm_activity_f.ps.
 
21
Netsizer, "Evaluating the size of the internet," http://www.netsizer.com.

CITED BY  93

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Moore: colleagues
Colleen Shannon: colleagues
k claffy: colleagues