A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work

ABSTRACT

In designing computer-based systems, we work within a perspective that shapes the design questions that will be asked and the kinds of solutions that are sought. This paper introduces a perspective based on language as action, and explores its consequences for practical system design. The language/action perspective is contrasted to a number of other currently prominent perspectives, and is illustrated with an extended example based on studies of nursing work in a hospital ward. We show how it leads to particular analyses of that work, which reveal potentials for creating new designs that can make the work (and the workers) more effective.

REFERENCES

• 1: Andersen, Peter Bogh and Madsen, Kim Halskov, How to handle the intangible: Metaphors in design and use of computer system, draft report, Aarhus University 1986.
• 2: Austin, John, How to Do Things with Words, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1962.
• 3: Barwise, Jon and John Perry, Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bradford/M.I.T. Press, 1983.
• 4: Ciborra, Claudio U., Reframing the role of computers in organizations, the transaction costs approach, Sixth Annual International Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis, December, 1985.
• 5: Research Program on Situated Language, Report CSLI-1, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, 1984.
• 6: DeCindio, F., G. DeMichelis, and C. Simoni, Petri net models of office game rules for office automation, Instituto di Cibernetica, Universita di Milano, draft, 1985.
• 7: Ehn, Pelle and Morten Kyng, A tool perspective on the design of interactive computer support for skilled workers, in M. Saaksjarvi (ed.), Report of the Seventh Scandinavian Research Seminar on Systemeering, Helsinki, 1984.
• 8: Fafchamps, Danielle, Medical deliberation: an alternative approach to medical decision making, Stanford University dissertation, in preparation.
• 9: Flores, C. Fernando, Management and communication in the office of the future, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1981.
• 10: Flores, C. Fernando and Juan Ludlow, Doing and speaking in the office, in G. Fick and R. Sprague (Eds.), DSS: Issues and Challenges, London: Pergamon Press, 1981.
• 11: Gerson, Elihu M., Information systems in complex organizations: Challenges for research, Tremont Research Institute, draft, 1985.
• 12: Holt, Anatol, Primitive man in the electronic work environment, Presented at the conference on electronic work, Milan, March 1986.
• 13: Holt, Anatol, H.R. Ramsey, and J.D. Grimes, Coordination system technology as the basis for a programming environment, Electrical Communication 57:4 (1983).
• 14: Howard, Robert, UTOPIA: Where workers craft new technology, Technology Review 88:3 (April, 1985), 43--49.
• 15: J. Kaasboll, Intentional development of professional language through computerization. A case study and some theoretical considerations, The IFIP TC 9/WG 9.1 Working Conference on system design for human development and productivity: participation and beyond on System design for human development and productivity: participation and beyond, p.371-382, January 1987, Berlin, Germany
• 16: Kaasbøll, Jens, Observation of people working with information: A case study, draft dated Jan 7, 1986, submitted for publication.
• 17: Kling, Rob, and Walt Scacchi, The web of computing: Computing technology as social organization, in M. Yovits (Ed.), Advances in Computers, Vol. 21, 1982, 1--90.
• 18: Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
• 19: Nygaard, Kristen, Program development as a social activity, to be presented at IFIP 1986 World Conference, Dublin.
• 20: Nygaard, Kristen, and Pal Sorgaard, The perspective concept in informatics, Working Conference on Development and Use of Computer-based Systems and Tools, Aarhus, 1985.
• 21: Julian E. Orr, Narratives at work: story telling as cooperative diagnostic activity, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas [doi>10.1145/637069.637077]
• 22: Schneider, Leslie, and Robert Howard, Office automation in a manufacturing setting, study prepared for the United States Office of Technology Assessment, April, 1985.
• 23: Searle, John, Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969
• 24: Searle, John R., A taxonomy of illocutionary acts, in K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975 344--369.
• 25: Lucy A. Suchman, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1987
• 26: Winograd, Terry, Moving the semantic fulcrum Linguistics and Philosophy, 8:1 (1985), 91--104.
• 27: Winograd, Terry, The design of collaboration: contrastive case study of two tools for conversation forthcoming (submitted for publication).
• 28: Terry Winograd , Fernando Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1987