ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Image-based reconstruction of spatial appearance and geometric detail
Full text PdfPdf (302 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 22 ,  Issue 2  (April 2003) table of contents
Pages: 234 - 257  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0730-0301
Authors
Hendrik P. A. Lensch  Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Jan Kautz  Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Michael Goesele  Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Wolfgang Heidrich  The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Hans-Peter Seidel  Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 129,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/636886.636891
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Real-world objects are usually composed of a number of different materials that often show subtle changes even within a single material. Photorealistic rendering of such objects requires accurate measurements of the reflection properties of each material, as well as the spatially varying effects. We present an image-based measuring method that robustly detects the different materials of real objects and fits an average bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) to each of them. In order to model local changes as well, we project the measured data for each surface point into a basis formed by the recovered BRDFs leading to a truly spatially varying BRDF representation. Real-world objects often also have fine geometric detail that is not represented in an acquired mesh. To increase the detail, we derive normal maps even for non-Lambertian surfaces using our measured BRDFs. A high quality model of a real object can be generated with relatively little input data. The generated model allows for rendering under arbitrary viewing and lighting conditions and realistically reproduces the appearance of the original object.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
Forsyth, D. A. and Zisserman, A. 1989. Mutual Illumination. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '89). IEEE Computer Society Press, 466--473.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Gibson, S., Howard, T., and Hubbold, R. 2001. Flexible image-based photometric reconstruction using virtual light sources. Comput. Graph. Forum 20, 3. ISSN 1067--7055.
 
12
Goesele, M., Heidrich, W., Lensch, H. P., and Seidel, H.-P. 2000. Building a photo studio for measurement purposes. In Proceedings of Vision, Modeling, and Visualization. 231--238.
 
13
Goesele, M., Heidrich, W., and Seidel, H.-P. 2001. Entropy based dark frame subtraction. In Image Processing, Image Quality, Image Capture Systems Conference (PICS). 293--298.
14
15
 
16
Kobbelt, L. 1996. Discrete fairing. In Proceedings of the 7th IMA Conference on the Mathematics of Surfaces. 101--131.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
22
 
23
Lewis, R. 1993. Making shaders more physically plausible. In 4th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 47--62.
24
 
25
Lloyd, S. 1982. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-28, 129--137.
 
26
Lu, R., Koenderink, J., and Kappers, A. 1998. Optical Properties (bidirectional reflectance distribution functions) of velvet. Applied Optics 37, 25 (Sept.), 5974--5984.
 
27
MacQueen, J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1.
28
 
29
 
30
Marschner, S., Westin, S., Lafortune, E., Torrance, K., and Greenberg, D. 1999. Image-based BRDF Measurement Including Human Skin. In 10th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 131--144.
31
 
32
 
33
McAllister, D. 2002. A Generalized Representation of Surface Appearance. Ph.D. thesis, University of North Carolina.
 
34
 
35
Miller, G., Rubin, S., and Ponceleon, D. 1998. Lazy decompression of surface light fields for precomputed global illumination. In 9th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 281--292.
 
36
 
37
Nayar, S. K., Ikeuchi, K., and Kanade, T. 1990. Shape from Interreflections. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV '90). Osaka, Japan, 2--11.
 
38
39
 
40
Robertson, M. A., Borman, S., and Stevenson, R. L. 1999. Dynamic Range Improvement Through Multiple Exposures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP'99). IEEE, 159--163.
 
41
Rushmeier, H., Bernardini, F., Mittleman, J., and Taubin, G. 1998. Acquiring input for rendering at appropriate levels of detail: Digitizing a piet&abrave;. Eurographics Rendering Workshop 1998, 81--92. ISBN 3-211-83213-0. Held in Vienna, Austria.
 
42
 
43
 
44
Schirmacher, H., Heidrich, W., Rubick, M., Schiron, D., and Seidel, H.-P. 1999. Image-Based BRDF Reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 4th VMV Conference. 285--292.
 
45
Torrance, K. and Sparrow, E. 1967. Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. J. Optic. Soc. Amer. 57, 9.
46
47
 
48
 
49
50
 
51
 
52
Zhang, Z. 1999. Flexible Camera Calibration By Viewing a Plane From Unknown Orientations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. 666--673.

CITED BY  29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hendrik P. A. Lensch: colleagues
Jan Kautz: colleagues
Michael Goesele: colleagues
Wolfgang Heidrich: colleagues
Hans-Peter Seidel: colleagues