ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The (in)effectiveness of animation in instruction
Full text PdfPdf (192 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Seattle, Washington
SESSION: Short talks: understanding interfaces table of contents
Pages: 377 - 378  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-340-5
Authors
Julie B. Morrison  Stanford, California
Barbara Tversky  Stanford, California
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/634067.634290
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Animated graphics have been increasingly adopted to teach complex systems, encouraged by the preconception that realism is effective. Nevertheless, the evidence has been discouraging as to their effectiveness. By the Conceptual Congruence Hypothesis, graphics should be effective in conveying concepts that are literally or metaphorically spatial. By extension, animated graphics should be effective in conveying change in time. This hypothesis was investigated by comparing three interfaces that presented text, text plus static graphics, or text plus animated graphics. Evidence was obtained for the static version of the Conceptual Congruence Hypothesis. Graphics were more effective than text in some cases, especially for participants with low spatial ability, but animation did not further increase effectiveness.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59, 43-64.
 
3
Morrison, J. B., Tversky, B., & Betrancourt, M. (2000). Animation: Does it facilitate learning? Proceedings of Workshop on Smart Graphics. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
 
4


Collaborative Colleagues:
Julie B. Morrison: colleagues
Barbara Tversky: colleagues