ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Disentangling relative from absolute amplitude in Fitts' law experiments
Full text PdfPdf (178 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Seattle, Washington
SESSION: Short talks: interaction techniques table of contents
Pages: 315 - 316  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-340-5
Author
Yves Guiard  CNRS & Universitéé de la Méditerranée - France
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/634067.634254
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Target distance (D) and target width (W), traditionally treated as independent variables in Fitts' target acquisition paradigm, are shown to suffer inextricable confounds with task difficulty. Through a simple geometrical analogy, it is shown that relative movement amplitude D/W(which determines difficulty) and absolute movement amplitude D (or scale) are the only two variables that can be manipulated independently in a Fitts' task experiment. Disentangling relative amplitude from absolute amplitude with an appropriate experimental design should help to study target acquisition in graphical user interfaces.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Card, S. K., English, W. K., and Burr, B. J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics, 21, 8 (1978), 601-613.
2
 
3
Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47, 6 (1954), 381-391.
4
 
5
Jagacinski, R. J. & Monk, D. L. (1985). Fitts' law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. J. Motor Behav. 17, 1 (1985), 77-95.
 
6
Gan, K. C., & Hoffmann, E. R. Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements. Ergonomics, 31, (1988), 829-839.
 
7
 
8
Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Kornblum, S., .Abrams, R. A., and Wright, C. E. Optimality in human motor performance. Psychol. Rev. 95,3 (1988), 340-370.
 
9
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., and Quinn, J. T. Jr. Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev. 86, 5 (1979), 415-451.
 
10
Welford, A. T., Norris, A. H., & Shock, N. W. Speed and accuracy of movements and their changes with age. Acta Psychol. 30 (1969), 3-15.

CITED BY  7