ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Psychophysiological indicators of the impact of media quality on users
Full text PdfPdf (195 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Seattle, Washington
SESSION: Doctoral consortium table of contents
Pages: 95 - 96  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-340-5
Author
Gillian M. Wilson  University College London, London
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/634067.634125
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The number of networked multimedia applications is increasing, therefore users' quality requirements need to be clearly specified. At present, subjective assessment is used to do this, however it has drawbacks when used in isolation. Therefore, this research approach is utilising physiological indicators of stress to measure the impact of media quality on users - this is defined as user cost. Four studies using this technique have shown that physiological responses to audio and video degradations can be detected and that they do not always correlate with subjective results. Subsequently, a three-tier approach to multimedia quality evaluation is proposed, which incorporates task performance, user satisfaction and user cost.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Seyle, H. (1956) The Stress of Life. McGraw-Hill.
 
4
Wilson, G. M. & Sasse, M. A. (2000) Do Users Always Know What's Good for Them? Utilising Physiological Responses to Assess Media Quality. In S. McDonald, Y. Waern & G. Cockton (eds.), Proceedings of HCI 2000: People and Computer XIV - Usability or Else!, pp. 327-339, 5th-8th September 2000, Sunderland, UK.
 
5
Wilson, G. M. & Sasse, M. A. (2000) Investigating the impact of audio degradations on users: Subjective vs. objective assessment methods. To appear in Proceedings of OZCHI 2000, 4th-8th December, Sydney, Australia.

CITED BY  8