ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life
Full text PdfPdf (2.24 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 32 ,  Issue 2  (February 1989) table of contents
Pages: 220 - 238  
Year of Publication: 1989
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Robert E. Kraut  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Susan T. Dumais  Bellcore, Morristown, NJ
Susan Koch  U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 126,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/63342.63347
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The impact of a computerized record system on the work lives of customer service representatives in a large utility company is examined. The results suggest alternate methods for thinking about and measuring technological impact.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adler, P. Rethinking the skill requirements of the new technologies. Working paper 9-784-027, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Mass., 1983.
 
2
Allen, L. Expert systems slip into mainstream MIS. The Spang Robinson Report on Artifical Intelligence, 4 (Apr. 1988), 2-10.
 
3
Appelbaum, E. Technology and the redesign of work in the insurance industry. Proj. Rept. No. 84-A22, Institute for Research on Education, Finance and Government, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1984.
 
4
Attewell, P. The automated office: A case study. Department of Sociology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, N.Y., 1985.
5
 
6
Baran, B. The technological transformation of white collar work: A case study of the insurance industry. In Computer Chips and Paper Clips (VoI 2), H. Hartmann, Ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1987.
 
7
Baran, B., and Teegarden, S. Women's labor in the office of the futttre: Changes in the occupational structure of the insurance industry. Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif, 1984.
 
8
Bern, D., and McConnell, H. Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. J. Personality and Social Psych. 14 (Jan. 1970), 23-31.
 
9
Benoit, C., Cossette, A., and Cardillo, P. L'incidence de la Machine a Traitement de Textes sur l'Emploi et le Travail. Ministere du Travail, Montreal, Quebec, 1984.
 
10
 
11
Braverman, H. Labor and manopaly capital. Monthly Review Press. New York, '1974
 
12
Briefs, U., Ciborra, C.,and Schneider, L. Systems Design For, With, And By the Users. North Holland, New York, 1983.
 
13
Cammann, C., et al. Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In Assessing Organizational Change, Seashore, S., et al. Eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1983, 71-138.
 
14
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Rand McNally & Co., Chicago, 1966.
 
15
Center for Career Research and Human Resources Management. Results of the study of the introduction of datapoint terminals. In Computer Chips and Paper Clips, Hartmann, H., Kraut, R., and Tilly, L., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1986.
16
 
17
Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1975
 
18
Downing, H. Word processors and the oppression of women. In The Microelectronics Revolution, T. Forester, Ed., Basil Blackwell, Publisher, Oxford, England, 1980,
 
19
Driscoll, J. Office automation: The dynamics of a technological boondoggle. Paper presented at the International Office Automation Symposium, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1980.
 
20
Dubnoff, S. Inter-occupational shifts and changes in the quality of work in the American economy, 1900-1970. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, San Francisco Calif., 1978.
 
21
Egan, D. E., and Gomez, L. M. {1985). Assaying, isolating, and accommodating individual differences in learning a complex skill. In Individual Differences in Cognition, VoI. 2. Academic Press. New York, 173.-217.
 
22
Giuiiano, V. E. The mechanization of office work. Sci. Amer. 247, 2 (Sept. 1982}, 66-76.
 
23
Glenn, E., and Feldberg, R. (1977). Degraded and deskilled: The proletarianization of clerical work. Soc. Prob. 25 (1977), pp. 52-64.
 
24
Gove, W. R., and Geerken, M. R. The effect of children and employmenl on the mental health of married men and women. Soc. Forces 56 (Sept.}. 66-76.
 
25
Nussbaum, K., and Gregory, J. Race against time: Automation of the office. Working Women's Education Fund, Cleveland, Ohio, 1982.
 
26
Gur,;lein, M,, and Faulkner, F. Office automation and organizational culture: A case study of two implementations of an automatic call distributor. In Computer and Society Conference (Rochester, N.Y., June 21). 1985.
 
27
Hartmann, H., Kraut, R.E., and Tilly, L. Computer Chips and Paper Clip,:: Technology and Women's Employment. National Academy Press, Washington. D.C., 1986.
 
28
Herman, G. Customer Access Issues in Business Office Specialization. Memorandum for file 3381-791112.01MF. Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, N.J., 1979.
 
29
Herman, G., Owens, K., and Schottland, H. Service representative questionnaire study. Tech. Memo. 79-3431-2, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill. N.J.. 1979.
30
 
31
Jay, T. Defining and measuring computerphobia. In Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II,.R.E. Eberts and C. G. Eberts. Eds., North Holland, New York, 1985, 321-326.
 
32
}ohn,;on, B., et al. Innovation in office systems implementation. Report No. 8110791, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1985.
 
33
Johnson, B., and Rice, R. Reinvention in the innovation process. In The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, R. Rice, Ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 157-184.
 
34
35
 
36
Kling, R., and Scacchi, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers 21 {1982}, 1-90.
 
37
 
38
Locke, E. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, M.Dunnette, Ed., Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, 1976
 
39
March, J. Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway, 1976.
40
 
41
Mowshowitz, A., Ed. Human choice and computers. North Holland, New 'fork. 1980.
 
42
Mumtbrd, E. Values, technology and work. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1981.
 
43
Murphree, M. C. Brave new office: The changing world of the legal secretary. In My troubles are going to have trouble with me: Everyday trials and triumphs of women workers, K. Sacks and D. Remy, Eds., Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N.J., 1984
 
44
9-to-5, The National Association of Working Women, The 9-to-5 National Survey on Women and Stress (with Office Automation Addendum). Cleveland, Ohio, 1984.
 
45
Nisbetl, R., and Wilson, T. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psych. Rev. 84, 3 (May 1!)77}, 231-259.
 
46
Nussbaum K., and Gregory, J. Race against time: Automation of the office. Working Women Education Fund, Cleveland, Ohio, 1980.
 
47
Rice, R., and Rogers, E. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization, 1, (198C.), 499-514.
 
48
Poppel, H. Who needs the office of the filture? Harvard Bus. Rev. 60 (Nov-Dec. 1982), 146-155.
 
49
Slack, J. Communication technologies and society. Able:,:, Norwood, N,J,, 1984.
 
50
Spinrad, R. J. Office automation. Science, 215 (1982), 808-813.
51
 
52
U.S. National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress. The employment impact of technological change: technology and the American economic progress. Report of the U.S. National Commission on Technology, Automation, and Economic Progress, Volume 1, Serial No. 0-788-561, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1966.
 
53

CITED BY  17


REVIEW

"Harold Borko : Reviewer"

Anyone who has tried to evaluate the impact of a newly installed computerized information system on an organization and on the work experiences of the employees who use the system has become aware of the many difficulties that such a study invol  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert E. Kraut: colleagues
Susan T. Dumais: colleagues
Susan Koch: colleagues