Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a study that probes the cost of interrupting users with instant messages during different phases of a computing task. We found that interrupting users during the "evaluation phase" of the task resulted in significantly longer completion times than interruptions in other phases. We also found that interruptions that were irrelevant to the task resulted in longer times to process the message and longer task resumption times than relevant messages. These initial results have implications for the principled design of intelligent interrupters and instant messages.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bryan, W. and Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits, Psych Rev, 6, 345-75.
• 2: Gillie, T. and Broadbent, D. (1989). What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychol Res, 50, 243-50.
• 3: Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A. and Hovel, D. (1999). Attention-sensitive alerting, 15th Conf. on Uncertainty and AI (UAI '99), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 305-13.
• 4: McFarlane, D. (1999). Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. , Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'99, IOS Press, Inc., The Netherlands, pp. 295-303.
• 5: Miyata, Y. and Norman, D. A. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), User Centered Design: New Perspectives on Human Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 265-84.