|
ABSTRACT
Polynomial systems of equations frequently arise in many applications such as solid modelling, robotics, computer vision, chemistry, chemical engineering, and mechanical engineering. Locally convergent iterative methods such as quasi-Newton methods may diverge or fail to find all meaningful solutions of a polynomial system. Recently a homotopy algorithm has been proposed for polynomial systems that is guaranteed globally convergent (always converges from an arbitrary starting point) with probability one, finds all solutions to the polynomial system, and has a large amount of inherent parallelism. There are several ways the homotopy algorithms can be decomposed to run on a hypercube. The granularity of a decomposition has a profound effect on the performance of the algorithm. The results of decompositions with two different granularities are presented. The experiments were conducted on an iPSC-16 hypercube using actual industrial problems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
E. ALLGOWER AND K. GEORG, Simplicial and continuation methods for approximating fixed points, SIAM Rev., 22 (1980), pp. 28-85.
|
| |
2
|
D. C. S. ALLISON, S. HA}tIMOTO, AND L. T. WATSON, The Granularity of Parallel Homotopy Algorithms for Polynomial Systems of Equation, Manuscript.
|
| |
3
|
S. C. BILLUPS, An augmented Jacobian matrix algorithm for tracking homotopy zero curves, M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Sci., VPI&SU, Blacksburg, VA, Sept., 1985.
|
| |
4
|
R. H. BYRD, R. B. SCHNABEL, AND G. A. SHULTZ, Using parallel function evaluation to improve Hessian approximation for unconstrained optimization, Technical Report CS-CU-361-87, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, 1987.
|
| |
5
|
S. N. CHOW, J. MALLET-PARET, AND j. A. YORKE, Finding zeros of maps: Homotopy methods that are constructive with probability one, Math. Comput., 32 (1978), pp. 887-899.
|
| |
6
|
M. COSNAaD, Y. ROBERT, AND D. TRYSTaAN, Comparison ofparallel diagonalization methods for solving dense linear systems, Sessions of the French Acad. of Sci. on Math., Nov., 1985, p. 781ff.
|
| |
7
|
J. E. DENNIS JR., AND R. B. SCHNABEL, A view of unconstrained optimization, Tech. Rep. CU- CS-376-87, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, 1987.
|
| |
8
|
G. H. ELLIS AND L. T. WATSON, A parallel algorithm for simple roots of polynomials, Comput. Math. Appl., 10 (1984), pp.107-121.
|
| |
9
|
R. A. FINKEL, Large-grain Parallelism - Three case studies, in The characteristics of parallel algorithms, L. H. Jamieson, D. B. Gannon, and R. J. Douglass, eds., (1987), pp. 21-63.
|
| |
10
|
W. GENTZSCH AND G. SCHAFER, Solution of large linear systems on vector computers, Parallel Computing 83, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 159-166.
|
| |
11
|
D. HELLEa, A survey of parallel algorithms in numerical linear algebra, SIAM Rev., 20 (1978), pp. 740-777.
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
A. P. MOaGAN, A transformation to avoid solutions at infinity for polynomial systems, Appl. Math. Comput., 18 (1986), pp. 77-86.
|
| |
14
|
-----, A homotopy for solving polynomial systems, Appl. Math. Comput., 18 (1986), pp. 87-92.
|
| |
15
|
-----, Solving polynomial systems using continuation for engineering and scientific problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
D. A. REED AND M. L. PATRTCK, A model of asynchronous itemtive algorithms for solving large sparse linear systems, Proc. 1984 Internat. Conf. on Parallel Processing, August 21-24, 1984, pp. 402-410.
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
T. A. Rice. AND L. J. SIEGEL, A parallel algorithm for finding the roots of a polynomial, Proc. Internat. Conf. Parallel Processing, Bellaire, MI, Aug. 24-27, pp. 57-61, 1982.
|
| |
21
|
R. B. SCHNASEL, AND P. D. FgANK, Solving systems of nonlinear equations by tensor methods, Tech. Rep. CU-CS-334-86, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, June, 1986.
|
| |
22
|
R. B. SCHNABEL, Concurrent function evaluations in local and global optimization, Tech. Rep. CS-CU-345-86, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, 1986.
|
| |
23
|
H. SCHWANDT, Newton-like interval methods for large nonlinear systems of equations on vector computers, Computer Phys. Comm., 37 (1985), pp. 223-232.
|
| |
24
|
H. J. SIPS, A parallel processor for nonlinear recurrence systems, Proc. 1st Internat. Conf. on Supercomputing Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1984, pp. 660-671.
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
L. T. WATSON, A globally convergent algorithm for computing fixed points of C2 maps, Appl. M~th. Comput., 5 (1979), pp. 297-311.
|
| |
27
|
L. T. WATSON, S. C. BILLUPS, AND A. P. MORGAN, HOMPACK: A suite of codes for globally convergent homotopy algorithms, Tech. Rep. 85-34, Dept. of Industrial and Operations Eng., Univ. of Michigan., Ann Arbor, MI, 1985.
|
| |
28
|
L. T. WATSON, ?(umerical linear algebra aspects of globally convergent homotopy methods, Tech. Rep. TR-85-14, Dept. of Computer Sci., VPI&SU, Blacksburg, VA, 1985.
|
| |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Chakraborty , D. C. S. Allison , C. J. Ribbens , L. T. Watson, Parallel unit tangent vector computation for homotopy curve tracking on a hypercube, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM annual conference on Cooperation, p.103-108, February 20-22, 1990, Washington, D.C., United States
|
|