| Binsorting on hypercubes with d-port communication |
| Full text |
Pdf
(785 KB)
|
| Source
|
Hypercube Concurrent Computers and Applications
archive
Proceedings of the third conference on Hypercube concurrent computers and applications - Volume 2
table of contents
Pasadena, California, United States
Pages: 1455 - 1461
Year of Publication: 1989
ISBN:0-89791-278-0
|
|
Authors
|
|
S. R. Seidel
|
Department of Computer Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
|
|
W. L. George
|
Department of Computer Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0, Downloads (12 Months): 7, Citation Count: 5
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Three sorting algorithms are given for hypercubes with d-port communication. All of these algorithms are based on binsort at the global level. The binsort allows the movement of keys among nodes to be performed by a d-port complete exchange rather than a sequence of l-port exchanges as in other algorithms. This lowers communication costs by at least a factor of d compared to other sorting algorithms. The first algorithm assumes the keys are uniformly distributed and selects bin boundaries based on the global maximum and minimum keys. The other two algorithms make no assumption about the distribution of keys and so they sample the keys before the binsort in order to estimate their distribution. Splitting keys based on that estimate reduce the variance among the lengths of the subsequences left in the nodes after the complete exchange of bins which in turn helps to balance the computational load in each node. The performance of two of these algorithms on an FPS T-40 is given for data of various distributions and is compared to the performance of bitonic sort and hyperquicksort.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
K.E. Batcher, Sorting networks and their applications, Spring Joint Computer Conference, AFiPS Proceedings, v. 32, 1968, 307-314.
|
| |
2
|
E. Felten, S. Karlin and S. Otto, Sorting on a hypercube, Caltech/JPL Hm244, 1986.
|
| |
3
|
J.L. Gustafson, S. Hawkinson and K. Scott, The architecture of a homogeneous vector supercomputer, Int'l Conf. on Parallel Processing, 1986, 649-652.
|
| |
4
|
C. Ho and S. L. Johnsson, Spanning graphs for optimum broadcasting and personalized communication in hypercubes, YALEU/Dept. of Computer Science/Tech. Rep.-500, Nov. 1986.
|
| |
5
|
P.J. Janus and E. A. Lamagna, An adaptive method for unknown distributions in distributive partitioned sorting, IEEE Trans. Comp. C-34,4 (Apr. 1985), 367- 372.
|
| |
6
|
S.L. Johnsson, Combining parallel and sequential sorting on a Boolean n-cube , lnt'l Conf. on Parallel Processing, 1984, 444-448.
|
| |
7
|
P.P. Li, Parallel sorting on Ametek/S14, Ametek Computer Research Division, Arcadia, CA , Sept. 1986.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Q. Stout and B. Wagar, Passing messages in linkbound hypercubes, Hypercube Multiprocessors 1987, SIAM Press, Phila., 1987, 251-257.
|
| |
10
|
Q. Stout, Personal communication, Jan. 1988.
|
| |
11
|
B. Wagar, Hyperquicksort: A fast sorting algorithm for hypercubes, Hypercube Multiprocessors 1987, SIAM Press, Phila., 1987, 292-299.
|
CITED BY 5
|
|
|
|
|
William L. Hightower , Jan F. Prins , John H. Reif, Implementations of randomized sorting on large parallel machines, Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, p.158-167, June 29-July 01, 1992, San Diego, California, United States
|
|
|
Guy E. Blelloch , Charles E. Leiserson , Bruce M. Maggs , C. Greg Plaxton , Stephen J. Smith , Marco Zagha, A comparison of sorting algorithms for the connection machine CM-2, Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, p.3-16, July 21-24, 1991, Hilton Head, South Carolina, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|