ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some measures and procedures for evaluation of the user interface in an information retrieval system
Full text PdfPdf (1.18 MB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Grenoble, France
Pages: 371 - 385  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:2-7061-0309-4
Authors
J. Tague  School of Library and Information Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1
R. Schultz  School of Library and Information Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1
Sponsor
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/62437.62477
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Planning the evaluation of an information retrieval system involves two steps: first, a determination of performance descriptors and measures appropriate to the system objectives and, secondly, a development of an evaluation design which ensures the effect of variation in components of interest will be isolated and assessed in an unbiased fashion. This paper examines the question of retrieval system evaluation from the perspective of the user. It presents evaluation procedures which are appropriate to this perspective and which can be used to isolate the effect of variation in the user interface to the system. The general procedure is exemplified by an application to evaluation of an experimental OPAC interface.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
BELKIN82
Belkin N.J., Oddy R.N., Brooks H.M., "ASK for Information Retrieval. Part 1. Background and Theory", Journal of Documentation 38(2), 1982, pp. 61-71.
 
DERVIN84
Dervin B., "The Information Needs of Californians- 1984; Report #2- Context, Summary, Conclusions, Implications, Applications", Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, Davis, 1984.
 
FARRADANE73
Farradane J., "On the Inverse Relationship of Recall and Precision," Journal of Documentation 29(2), 1973, pp. 229-30.
 
MCCAIN87
 
ROBERTS79
Roberts F.S., "Measurement Theory", Addison-Wesley, 1979.
 
SALTON83
 
STEVENS83
Stevens G.C., "User-Friendly Systems: A Critical Examination of the Concept," Behavior and Information Technology 2(1), 1983, pp. 3-16.
TAGUE87
TAGUE87
 
WERSIG85
Wersig G., Windel G., "Information Science Needs a Theory of 'Information Actions'," Social Science Information Studies 5, 1985, pp. 11-23.
 
WINOGRAD86