|
ABSTRACT
The foundations for research and action in the area of group work are examined. Four alternative “world views” are presented. One of these, contextualism, is discussed in depth. Its methodological consequences for research and implications for reform of group meetings are explored.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Michael Begeman , Peter Cook , Clarence Ellis , Mike Graf , Gail Rein , Tom Smith, Project Nick: meetings augmentation and analysis, Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, December 03-05, 1986, Austin, Texas
[doi> 10.1145/637069.637071]
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Heidegger, M. Being and Time trans. by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson Harper and Row, New York, 1962.
|
| |
5
|
Piaget, J. The Origins & Intelligence in Children International Universities Press, New York: 1952.
|
| |
6
|
Pepper, Stephen C. World Hypotheses University of California Press, Berkeley: 1942.
|
| |
7
|
Searle, J., R. Speech Acts Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England:1969.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Werner, H. The Comparative Psvchology of Mental Develonment International Universities Press, New York, 1948.
|
| |
10
|
Whiteside, J.; Bennett, J.; and Holtzblatt, K. Usability Engineering: our experience and evolution to appear in Helander, M. Handbook of Human-Comnuter Interaction. North Holland Press.
|
| |
11
|
Whiteside. J. and Wixon, D. Developmental theory as a framework for studying humancomputer interaction in H.R. Hartson (ed.), Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Ablex. Norwood, NJ, 1985.
|
| |
12
|
|
|