|
ABSTRACT
A new selection is made for an efficient two-step block Runge-Kutta formula of order 6. The new formula is developed using some of the efficiency criteria recently investigated by Shampine, and as a result, a block formula with much improved performance is obtained. An important property of this new formula is that there is a “natural” interpolating polynomial available. This can be used to compute approximate solution values at off-step points without the need to compute any additional function evaluations. The quality of this interpolant is examined, and it is shown to have certain desirable properties. The performance of the new block Runge-Kutta formula is evaluated using the DETEST test set and is shown to be more efficient than certain other standard Runge-Kutta formulas for this particular test set.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
BUTCHER, J.C. Coefficients for the study of Runge-Kutta integration processes. J. AuNt. Math. Soc. 3 (1963), 185-201.
|
| |
2
|
BUTCHER, J.C. Implicit Runge-Kutta processes. Math. Comput. 18 (1964), 50-64.
|
| |
3
|
CASH, j.R. Block Runge-Kutta methods for the numerical integration of initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. Math. Comput. 40 (1983), 175-191.
|
| |
4
|
CASH, J.R. Block embedded explicit Runge-Kutta methods. Comput. Math. Appl. 11 (1985), 395-409.
|
| |
5
|
CASH, J. R. A block 5(4) explicit Runge-Kutta formula with "free" interpolation. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1230, J. P. Hennart, Ed., Springer, New York, 1986, 208-220.
|
| |
6
|
DORMAND, J. R., AND PRINCE, P.J. A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae, j. Comput. Appl. Math. 6 (1980), 19-26.
|
| |
7
|
DORMAND, J. R., AND PRINCE, P.J. High order embedded Runge-Kutta formulae. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 7 (1981), 67-74.
|
| |
8
|
ENGLAND, R. Error estimates for Runge-Kutta type solutions to systems of ordinary differential equations. Comput. J. 12 (1969), 166-170.
|
| |
9
|
ENRIGHT, W. H., JACKSON, K. R., NORSETT, S. P., AND THOMSEN, P.G. Effective solution of discontinuous IVPs using a Runge-Kutta formula pair with interpolants. Rep. 113, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Manchester, U.K., 1986.
|
| |
10
|
FEHLBERG, E. Low-order classical Runge-Kutta formulas with step size control and their application to some heat transfer problems. Rep. NASA TR R-315, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Marshall, Ala., 1969.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
LAMBERT, J.D. Computational Methods in Ordinary Differential Equations. Wiley, New York, 1973.
|
| |
13
|
MERSON, R.H. An operational method for tne study of integration processes. In Proceedings of a Symposium on Data Processing. Weapons Research Establishment, Salisbury, South Australia, 1957.
|
| |
14
|
SHAMPINE, a.F. Interpolation for Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 22 (1985), 1014-1027.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
SHAMPINE, L. F., AND WATTS, H.A. Subroutine RKF45. In Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, G. E. Forsythe, M. A. Malcolm, and C. B. Moler, Eds. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1977, 135-147.
|
| |
17
|
SHINTAN|, H. Two step processes by one step methods of order 3 and of order 4. J. Sci. (Hiroshima Univ. Ser. A-I) 30 (1966), 183-195.
|
REVIEW
"Lawrence Shampine : Reviewer"
It is hard for a new approach such as block Runge-Kutta formulas
to win acceptance. A promising idea is just the start of a
laborious process. Traditional Runge-Kutta formulas have been
refined over a long period; they are still being improved a
more...
|