ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Experiments in social data mining: The TopicShop system
Full text PdfPdf (378 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 1  (March 2003) table of contents
Pages: 54 - 85  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:1073-0516
Authors
Brian Amento  AT&T Labs---Research, Florham Park, NJ
Loren Terveen  AT&T Labs---Research, Florham Park, NJ
Will Hill  AT&T Labs---Research, Florham Park, NJ
Deborah Hix  Virginia Tech
Robert Schulman  Virginia Tech
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 136,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/606658.606661
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Social data mining systems enable people to share opinions and benefit from each other's experience. They do this by mining and redistributing information from computational records of social activity such as Usenet messages, system usage history, citations, or hyperlinks. Some general questions for evaluating such systems are: (1) is the extracted information valuable? and (2) do interfaces based on the information improve user task performance? We report here on TopicShop, a system that mines information from the structure and content of Web pages and provides an exploratory information workspace interface. We carried out experiments that yielded positive answers to both evaluation questions. First, a number of automatically computable features about Web sites do a good job of predicting expert quality judgments about sites. Second, compared to popular Web search interfaces, the TopicShop interface to this information lets users select significantly more high-quality sites, in less time and with less effort, and to organize the sites they select into personally meaningful collections more quickly and easily. We conclude by discussing how our results may be applied and considering how they touch on general issues concerning quality, expertise, and consensus.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
 
7
Bederson, B. B., Hollan, J. D., Perlin, K., Meyer, J., Bacon, D., and Furnas, G. 1996. Pad++: A zoomable graphical sketchpad for exploring alternate interface physics. J. Visual Lang. Comput. 7, 3--31.
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Bush, V. 1945. As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly (July).
12
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. 1990. Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation, and Information Science. Elsevier, New York.
 
18
Garfield, E. 1979. Citation Indexing. ISI, Philadelphia.
19
20
 
21
Hill, W. C. and Hollan, J. D. 1994. History-enriched digital objects: Prototypes and policy issues. Inf. Soc. 10, 2, 139--145.
22
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
28
29
 
30
31
 
32
Page L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., and Winograd, T. 2002. The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the Web. Stanford Digital Libraries Working Paper.
33
34
35
36
37
38
 
39
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., and Batchelder, W. H. 1986. Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. Amer. Anthropol. 88, 2 (June), 313--338.
 
40
41
42
 
43
Terveen, L. G. and Hill, W. C. 2001. Beyond recommender systems: Helping people help each other. In HCI In The New Millennium, J. Carroll, Eds. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
44
45
46
 
47
 
48
Whittaker, S., Jones, Q., Nardi, B., Creech, M., Terveen, L., Isaacs, E., and Hainsworth, J. 2002. ContactMap: Using personal social networks to organize communication in a social desktop. Submitted.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brian Amento: colleagues
Loren Terveen: colleagues
Will Hill: colleagues
Deborah Hix: colleagues
Robert Schulman: colleagues