ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Response to the commentaries on Producing Quality Technical Information: the common sense of producing quality technical information
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) archive
Volume 26 ,  Issue 3  (August 2002) table of contents
DEPARTMENT: Reply table of contents
Pages: 148 - 154  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:1527-6805
Author
Morris Dean  University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/604228.604239
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The editor and principal writer of Producing Quality Technical Information (1983) responds to the commentaries: answering questions about the sources of PQTI; discussing what the System Information group at IBM's Santa Teresa Laboratory were doing about usability from 1979 to 1983; comparing the predecessor nine "ease-of-use factors" with the seven "qualities" of PQTI and the nine "quality characteristics" of Prentice Hall's subsequent editions of PQTI, published under the title Developing Quality Technical Information; and revealing his own motives and thought processes in working on several usability initiatives in the laboratory at that time, including the publication of PQTI.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bethke, F. J., Dean, W. M., Kaiser, P. H., Ort, E., and Pessin, F. H. (1981). Improving the usability of programming publications. IBM Systems Journal, 20(3), 306-320.
 
2
Dean, W. M. (1973). Invoking the muse of technical writing. Technical Communication, 20(4), 9-11.
 
3
Dean, M. (1981). Using experimental psychology in technical writing. Proceedings of the 28th International Technical Communication Conference. Pittsburgh, PA: Society for Technical Communication.
 
4
Dean, M. (1981). How to write meaningful computer messages. Proceedings of IBM Software Usability Symposium. Poughkeepsie, NY.
 
5
Dean M. (1982). How a computer should talk to people. IBM Systems Journal 21(4), 424-453.
 
6
Dean, M. (1982). How to help your readers get it the first time. Callout (the newsletter of the El Camino Chapter of the Society for Technical Communication), 10(1), 1.
 
7
Edwards, M. O. (1975). Preparation for solving problems creatively: A systematic approach to creative problem-solving and decision-making. Palo Alto, CA: Idea Development Associates.
 
8
Hergenhahn, B. R. (1976). An introduction to theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
 
9
Hilgard, E. R., and Bower, G. H. (1966). Theories of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
 
10
Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: H. Liveright.
 
11
Krech, D., and Crutchfield, R. S. (1962). Elements of psychology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
 
12
McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
 
13
Miller, G. A. (1967). Psychology of communication. Baltimore: Penguin.
 
14
Pirsig, R. M. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance: An inquiry into values. New York: Morrow.
 
15
Strunk, W., and White, E. B. (1972). The elements of style. New York: Macmillan.
 
16
Weinland, J. D. (1957). How to improve your memory. New York: Barnes and Noble.
 
17