ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
nuSketch battlespace: a demonstration
Full text PdfPdf (196 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Miami, Florida, USA
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Accepted Demo Papers table of contents
Pages: 322 - 322  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-586-6
Authors
Kenneth D. Forbus  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Jeffrey Usher  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Vernell Chapman  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/604045.604115
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sketching provides a natural means of interaction for many spatially-oriented tasks. One task where sketching is used extensively is when military planners are formulating battle plans, called Courses of Action (COAs). This paper describes a system we have built, nuSketch Battlespace (nSB), which provides a sketching interface for creating COAs. The system is described in the paper "Sketching for Military Courses of Action" in these proceedings. The demonstration will highlight:

  • How we engineer around the need for recognition in sketching systems (a key feature of the nuSketch approach to multimodal interfaces), so that we can focus instead on understanding.
  • The use of comic graphs to manipulate multiple states and the relationships between them, for developing and visualizing complex plans
  • The spatial reasoning carried out by nuSketch Battlespace, including the use of qualitative topology and Voronoi diagrams in computing spatial relationships, and our methods for path-finding and position-finding
  • The use of analogy to generate enemy intent hypotheses based on previously drawn sketches


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenneth D. Forbus: colleagues
Jeffrey Usher: colleagues
Vernell Chapman: colleagues