An experiment in automated humorous output production

ABSTRACT

Computational humor will be needed in interfaces, no less than other cognitive capabilities. There are many practical settings where computational humor will add value. Among them there are: business world applications (such as advertisement, e-commerce, etc...), general computer-mediated communication and human-computer interaction, increase in the friendliness of natural language interfaces, educational and edutainment systems. In particular in the educational field it is an important resource for getting selective attention, help in memorizing names and situations etc. And we all know how well it works with children.Automated humor production in general is a very difficult task but we wanted to prove that some results can be achieved even in short time. We have worked at a concrete limited problem, as the core of the European Project HAHAcronym. The main goal of HAHAcronym has been the realization of an acronym ironic re-analyzer and generator as a proof of concept in a focalized but non restricted context. In order to implement this system some general tools have been adapted, or developed for the humorous context. Systems output has been submitted to evaluation by human subjects, with a very positive result

REFERENCES

• 1: Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic Theory of Humor. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
• 2: Kim Binsted , Graeme Ritchie, An implemented model of punning riddles, Proceedings of the twelfth national conference on Artificial intelligence (vol. 1), p.633-638, October 1994, Seattle, Washington, United States
• 3: Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.
• 4: Freud, S. (1905). Der Witz und Seine Beziehung sum Unbewussten. Deutike, Leipzig and Vienna.
• 5: Hofstadter, D., Gabora, L., Raskin, V., and Attardo, S. (1989). Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition. . Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 2(4):293--347.
• 6: Hulstijn, J. and Nijholt, A., editors (1996) Proceedings of International Workshop on Computational Humour (TWLT 12), University of Twente, Enschede.
• 7: Minsky, M. (1980). Jokes and the logic of the cognitive unconscious. Technical report, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. AI memo 603.
• 8: Morkes, J., Kernal, H. and Nass, C. (1999). Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: a direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14:395--435.
• 9: Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.
• 10: Ruch, W. (1996). Special issue: Measurement approaches to the sense of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 9.
• 11: Stock, O. (1996). Password Swordfish: Verbal humor in the interface. In {6}.
• 12: Stock, O. and Strapparava, C. (2002) HAHAcronym: Humorous Agents for Humorous Acronyms. In {13}.
• 13: Stock, O. Strapparava, C., and Nijholt, A. (Eds.) Proc. of the April Fools Day Workshop on Computational Humor (TWLT-20), Trento, Italy.

INDEX TERMS

General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
computational humor, natural language processing