ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Buddies in a box: animated characters in consumer electronics
Full text PdfPdf (1.37 MB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Miami, Florida, USA
SESSION: Full Technical Papers table of contents
Pages: 34 - 38  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-586-6
Author
Elmo M. A. Diederiks  Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven, AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/604045.604055
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper it is argued that animated characters in the interaction with consumer electronics products can have four kinds of benefits. They can add fun to the interaction and realise a more enjoyable experience. Animated characters can deploy social behaviour and social rules known from daily life and thus make it more natural and easier to interact with consumer electronic products. Furthermore an animated character can set the right level of expectation and finally they can make system errors and interaction obstacles more acceptableTwo examples are described to illustrate this argumentation. The L-icons are virtual personal friends that live inside the television and that represent a so-called recommendation system. Bello is a virtual pet dog that facilitates voice-controlled interaction for a television set. The evaluation results of two example applications confirm the four arguments, but they also show that the right form of animated character must be application specific in order to come to an optimal match between the characteristics of the character and those of the system they represent


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
Diederiks, E., van de Sluis, R., Bello: an animated character facilitating voice control. in Hirose, M. (ed.), Human-computer interaction INTERACT 01, IOS press, pp. 686--687, 2001.
 
6
Diederiks, E.M.A., Do TVs listen better than dogs?: The effects of an animated character as an interface intermediary for voice-controlled interaction. in Proceedings of the AISB02 symposium on animating expressive characters for social interactions, SSAISB, 2002.
7
 
8
Hutchins, E., Metaphors for interface design. in Taylor, M., Néel, F., Bouwhuis, D. (eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue, Elsevier science publishers, pp. 11--28, 1989.
 
9
ISO/DIS 9241-11, Guidance on usability, 1997.
 
10
Kamm, C., Helander, M., Design issues for interfaces using voice Input. in Helander, M., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.), Handbook for HCI, Elsevier science publishers, pp. 1043-1059, 1997.
 
11
Koda, T., Maes, P., Agents with faces: The effects of personification of agents. in Proceedings of HCI96, pp. 239--245, 1996.
12
13
14
 
15
Norman, D., The psychology of everyday things, Basic books, 1988.
16
 
17
Persoon, E., SMASH: A concept for advanced use of storage in the home. in Proceedings of IMAGINA '98, 1998.
 
18
 
19
Rich, E., Users are individuals: individualizing user models. in International journal of man-machine studies, volume 18, pp. 199--214, 1983.
 
20
Thomas, F., et al, The illusion of life: Disney animation, Hyperion, 1995.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Elmo M. A. Diederiks: colleagues