ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The decay and failures of web references
Full text HtmlHtml (37 KB),  PdfPdf (137 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 46 ,  Issue 1  (January 2003) table of contents
Pages: 71 - 77  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Diomidis Spinellis  Athens University of Economics and Business in Greece
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 105,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602421.602422
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Attempting to determine how quickly archival information becomes outdated.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Berners-Lee, T. Cool URIs don't change. Current June 2002, 1998; www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI.
 
3
Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and McCahill, M. RFC 1738: Uniform resource locators (URL), December 1994.
4
5
 
6
Kling, R. and Covi, L. Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society 11, 4 (1995), 261--271.
 
7
Lawrence, S. and Giles, C.L. Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature 400 (1999), 107--109.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Meadows, A.J. Communicating Research. Academic Press, 1998, 221--222.
 
11
Moats, R. RFC 2141: URN syntax, May 1997.
 
12
Paskin, N. E-citations: Actionable identifiers and scholarly referencing. Learned Publishing 13, 3 (July 2000), 159--168.

CITED BY  12