ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Propositional proof complexity
Full text PdfPdf (25 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 50 ,  Issue 1  (January 2003) table of contents
Pages: 80 - 82  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Alexander Razborov  Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, and Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow, Russia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602382.602406
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Beame, P., and Pitassi, T. 1998. Propositional proof complexity: Past, present and future. Tech. Rep. TR98-067, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity.
 
2
 
3
Cook, S. A., and Reckhow, A. R. 1979. The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems. J. Symb. Logic 44, 1, 36--50.
 
4
 
5
Pudlák, P. 1998. The lengths of proofs. In Handbook of Proof Theory, S. Buss, Ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 547--637.
 
6
 
7
Razborov, A. 2002. Pseudorandom generators hard for k-DNF resolution and polynomial calculus resolution. Manuscript in preparation, to be available at http://www.genesis.mi.ras.ru/˜razborov.
 
8
Urquhart, A. 1995. The complexity of propositional proofs. Bull. Symb. Logic 1, 425--467.