| The importance of the P versus NP question |
| Full text |
Pdf
(31 KB)
|
| Source
|
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
archive
Volume 50 , Issue 1 (January 2003)
table of contents
Pages: 27 - 29
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0004-5411
|
|
Author
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23, Downloads (12 Months): 198, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Baker, T., Gill, J., and Solovay, R. 1975. Relativizations of the P =? NP question. SICOMP: SIAM J. Comput.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Gasarch, W. 2002. Guest column: The P=?NP poll. SIGACT NEWS 33, 2 (June), 34--47.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Levin, L. 1973. Universal search problems (in Russian). Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9, 3, 265--266. (English translation in Trakhtenbrot, B. A.: A survey of Russian approaches to Perebor (brute-force search) algorithms. Ann. Hist. Comput. 6 (1984), 384--400.)
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Robertson, N., and Seymour, P. D. 1983--1995. Graph minors i--xiii. J. Combinat. Theory B.
|
| |
12
|
Smale, S. 1998. Mathematical problems for the next century. MATHINT: The Mathematical Intelligencer 20.
|
| |
13
|
|
|