ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The importance of the P versus NP question
Full text PdfPdf (31 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 50 ,  Issue 1  (January 2003) table of contents
Pages: 27 - 29  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Stephen Cook  University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 198,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/602382.602398
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Baker, T., Gill, J., and Solovay, R. 1975. Relativizations of the P =? NP question. SICOMP: SIAM J. Comput.
3
 
4
Gasarch, W. 2002. Guest column: The P=?NP poll. SIGACT NEWS 33, 2 (June), 34--47.
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
Levin, L. 1973. Universal search problems (in Russian). Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9, 3, 265--266. (English translation in Trakhtenbrot, B. A.: A survey of Russian approaches to Perebor (brute-force search) algorithms. Ann. Hist. Comput. 6 (1984), 384--400.)
 
9
 
10
 
11
Robertson, N., and Seymour, P. D. 1983--1995. Graph minors i--xiii. J. Combinat. Theory B.
 
12
Smale, S. 1998. Mathematical problems for the next century. MATHINT: The Mathematical Intelligencer 20.
 
13