Markets for attention: will postage for email help?

ABSTRACT

Balancing the needs of information distributors and their audiences has grown harder in the age of the Internet. While the demand for attention continues to increase rapidly with the volume of information and communication, the supply of human attention is relatively fixed. Markets are a social institution for efficiently balancing supply and demand of scarce resources. Charging a price for sending messages may help discipline senders from demanding more attention than they are willing to pay for. Price may also help recipients estimate the value of a message before reading it. We report the results of two laboratory experiments to explore the consequences of a pricing system for electronic mail. Charging postage for email causes senders to be more selective and send fewer messages. However, recipients did not use the postage paid by senders as a signal of importance. These studies suggest markets for attention have potential, but their design needs more work.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bryk, A. & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• 2: Boyle, C. D. B., & Clarke, M. R. B. (1985). An Intelligent Mail Filter. Proceedings of the HCI'85 Conference on People and Computers: Designing the Interface (331--341).
• 3: Lorrie Faith Cranor , Brian A. LaMacchia, Spam!, Communications of the ACM, v.41 n.8, p.74-83, Aug. 1998 [doi>10.1145/280324.280336]
• 4: Cynthia Dwork , Moni Naor, Pricing via Processing or Combatting Junk Mail, Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Cryptology Conference on Advances in Cryptology, p.139-147, August 16-20, 1992
• 5: Federal Trade Commission. (2002). Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR Part 310. Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
• 6: Hayek, Friedrich A.. (1945). The Uses of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519--30.
• 7: Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., & Hovel, D. (1999). Attention-Sensitive Alerting. Proceedings of UAI '99, Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence, (pp 305--313). Stockholm, Sweden.
• 8: Kraut, R. E. & Attewell, P. (1997). Media use in a global corporation: Electronic mail and organizational knowledge. In S. Kiesler (Ed.) Culture of the Internet. (pp. 323--342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 9: Wendy E. Mackay, Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.4, p.380-397, Oct. 1988 [doi>10.1145/58566.58567]
• 10: Thomas W. Malone , Kenneth R. Grant , Kum-Yew Lai , Ramana Rao , David Rosenblitt, Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.5 n.2, p.115-131, April 1987 [doi>10.1145/27636.27637]
• 11: Thomas W Malone , Kenneth R Grant , Franklyn A Turbak , Stephen A Brobst , Michael D Cohen, Intelligent information-sharing systems, Communications of the ACM, v.30 n.5, p.390-402, May 1987 [doi>10.1145/22899.22903]
• 12: Mayer, M. (1977). The telephone and the uses of time. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone. (pp. 225--245). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• 13: Perlow, L. A. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 57--81.
• 14: Stephen Pollock, A rule-based message filtering system, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.6 n.3, p.232-254, July 1988 [doi>10.1145/45945.214327]
• 15: Pool, I., Inose, H., Takasaki, N. & Hurwitz, R. (1984). Communication flows: A census in the United States and Japan. New York: North-Holland.
• 16: Simon, H. A. (1982). Designing organizations for an information-rich world: Models of Bounded Rationality (pp. 171--185). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• 17: Telang, Rahul. (2002). Information Overload and Pricing of Communication Services. Carnegie Mellon University Working Paper.
• 18: United States Government Printing Office (1998). United States Code, Title 39 POSTAL SERVICE. Prohibition of pandering advertisements.
• 19: Wilson, R.B. (1993). Nonlinear Pricing. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 20: Zandt, van T. (2001, May 18). Information overload in a network of targeted communication. Downloaded from http://zandtwerk.insead.fr, September 14, 2001.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS
      H.4.3 Communications Applications
          Subjects: Electronic mail

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.1 THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY
      Subjects: Markets

General Terms:
Design, Economics, Experimentation

Keywords:
computer mediated communication, economics, electronic mail, empirical studies, markets, social impact, spam