ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
On the recommending of citations for research papers
Full text PdfPdf (184 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
SESSION: Social navigation table of contents
Pages: 116 - 125  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-560-2
Authors
Sean M. McNee  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Istvan Albert  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Dan Cosley  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Prateep Gopalkrishnan  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Shyong K. Lam  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Al Mamunur Rashid  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Joseph A. Konstan  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
John Riedl  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 28
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/587078.587096
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering has proven to be valuable for recommending items in many different domains. In this paper, we explore the use of collaborative filtering to recommend research papers, using the citation web between papers to create the ratings matrix. Specifically, we tested the ability of collaborative filtering to recommend citations that would be suitable additional references for a target research paper. We investigated six algorithms for selecting citations, evaluating them through offline experiments against a database of over 186,000 research papers contained in ResearchIndex. We also performed an online experiment with over 120 users to gauge user opinion of the effectiveness of the algorithms and of the utility of such recommendations for common research tasks. We found large differences in the accuracy of the algorithms in the offline experiment, especially when balanced for coverage. In the online experiment, users felt they received quality recommendations, and were enthusiastic about the idea of receiving recommendations in this domain.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Breese, J., Heckerman, D., and Kadie, C. Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering. In Proc. UAI 98, Madison, 1998, 43--52.
 
2
 
3
Egghe, L., and Rousseau, R. Introduction to Informetrics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
 
4
 
5
Garfield, E. Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. Wiley, New York, 1979.
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
Karypis, G. SUGGEST Top-N Recommendation Engine. Available for download from http://www.cs.umn.edu/ karpyis/suggest/.
10
11
 
12
 
13
Newman, M. E. J. Scientific collaboration networks: I. Network construction and fundamental results. Phys. Rev. E 64, 016131, 2001.
14
15
16
 
17
Scott, J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd Edition. Sage Publications, London, 2000.
 
18
19
20

CITED BY  28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sean M. McNee: colleagues
Istvan Albert: colleagues
Dan Cosley: colleagues
Prateep Gopalkrishnan: colleagues
Shyong K. Lam: colleagues
Al Mamunur Rashid: colleagues
Joseph A. Konstan: colleagues
John Riedl: colleagues