ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Our little help machines and their invisibilities
Full text PdfPdf (36 KB)
Source ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) archive
Volume 25 ,  Issue 4  (November 2001) table of contents
COLUMN: Commentaries table of contents
Pages: 141 - 144  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISSN:1527-6805
Author
David K. Farkas  University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/586569.586575
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the four kinds of invisibility Johnson-Eilola associates with minimalist help systems: fast information access that reduces user reflection and questioning, impersonal writing style that assumes the Shannon-Weaver communication model, narrow scope that leads to training but not teaching, and interface designs that oversimplify user tasks. For each of the four, the paper questions Johnson-Eilola's conclusions. Ultimately, the problems with truncated online help systems may disappear, as help systems are increasingly linking to the web, where adequate conceptual information is often supplied and opportunities for a social context for help are available.