ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Tarzan: a peer-to-peer anonymizing network layer
Full text PdfPdf (243 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Washington, DC, USA
SESSION: Peer to peer networks table of contents
Pages: 193 - 206  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-612-9
Authors
Michael J. Freedman  NYU Dept of Computer Science, New York, NY
Robert Morris  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 159,   Citation Count: 49
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/586110.586137
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Tarzan is a peer-to-peer anonymous IP network overlay. Because it provides IP service, Tarzan is general-purpose and transparent to applications. Organized as a decentralized peer-to-peer overlay, Tarzan is fault-tolerant, highly scalable, and easy to manage.Tarzan achieves its anonymity with layered encryption and multi-hop routing, much like a Chaumian mix. A message initiator chooses a path of peers pseudo-randomly through a restricted topology in a way that adversaries cannot easily influence. Cover traffic prevents a global observer from using traffic analysis to identify an initiator. Protocols toward unbiased peer-selection offer new directions for distributing trust among untrusted entities.Tarzan provides anonymity to either clients or servers, without requiring that both participate. In both cases, Tarzan uses a network address translator (NAT) to bridge between Tarzan hosts and oblivious Internet hosts.Measurements show that Tarzan imposes minimal overhead over a corresponding non-anonymous overlay route.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
The Anonymizer. http://anonymizer.com.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
Dai, W. Pipenet. http://www.eskimo.com/ weidai/pipenet.txt.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Electronic Frontiers Georgia (EFGA). Anonymous remailer information. http://anon.efga.org/Remailers/.
 
11
Federal Bureau of Investigations. Carnivore diagnostic tool. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/carnivore/carnivore.htm.
 
12
Federrath, H., Ed. Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies: International Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability (2001), vol. 2009 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag.
 
13
Goldberg, I., and Shostack, A. Freedom network 1.0 architecture, November 1999.
 
14
Goldberg, I., and Wagner, D. TAZ servers and the Rewebber network: Enabling anonymous publishing on the World Wide Web. First Monday 3, 4 (1998).
 
15
Guan, Y., Li, C., Xuan, D., Bettati, R., and Zhao, W. Preventing traffic analysis for real-time communication networks. In Proceedings of Milcom '99 (November 1999).
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
21
 
22
RIAA v. Verizon. Motion to enforce July 24, 2002 subpoena. U.S. Distinct Court, District of Columbia, August 20, 2002. Case No. 1:02MS00323.
 
23
Rosen, E., Viswanathan, A., and Callon, R. Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture, January 2001. RFC 3031.
 
24
25
 
26
 
27
28
 
29
Waldman, M., Rubin, A. D., and Cranor, L. F. Publius: A robust, tamper-evident, censorship-resistant, web publishing system. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Security Symposium (Denver, Colorado, August 2000), pp. 59--72.
 
30
Walton, G. China's Golden Shield: Corporations and the development of surveillance technology in the People's Republic of China, 2001. http://go.openflows.org/.
 
31
Wright, M., Adler, M., Levine, B. N., and Shields, C. An analysis of the degradation of anonymous protocols. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (San Diego, California, February 2002).

CITED BY  49

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael J. Freedman: colleagues
Robert Morris: colleagues