ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Work group structures and computer support: a field experiment
Full text PdfPdf (1.74 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 4  (October 1988) table of contents
Pages: 354 - 379  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
J. D. Eveland  The Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA
T. K. Bikson  The Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/58566.58568
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It is frequently suggested that work groups that have computer technology to support activities such as text editing, data manipulation, and communication develop systematically different structures and working processes from groups that rely on more conventional technologies such as memos, phone calls, and meetings. However, cross-sectional or retrospective research designs do not allow this hypothesis to be tested with much power. This field experiment created two task forces, each composed equally of recently retired employees and employees still at work but eligible to retire. They were given the identical tasks of preparing reports for their company on retirement planning issues, but they were randomly assigned to different technology conditions. One group had full conventional office support; the other had, in addition, networked microcomputers with electronic mail and routine office software. Structured interviews were conducted four times during the year-long project; in addition, electronic mail activity was logged in the on-line group. Although both groups produced effective reports, the two differed significantly in the kind of work they produced, the group structures that emerged, and evaluations of their own performance. Although the standard group was largely dominated by the employees through the extensive reliance on informal meetings, the electronic technology used by the other task force allowed the retirees to exercise primary leverage. We conclude that use of computer support for cooperative work results in both quantitative and qualitative changes but that effective participation in such electronically supported groups requires significant investments of time and energy on the part of its members to master the technology and a relatively high level of assistance during the learning process.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
BIKSON, T. K. Understanding the implementation of office technology. Technology and the Transformation of White-Collar Work, R. Kraut, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, N.J., 1987, pp. 155-176; also The Rand Corporation, N-2619-NSF, June 1987.
 
2
BIKSON, T. K., AND EVELAND, J. D. New Office Technology: Planning for People, Work in America Institute's Series in Productivity. Pergamon Press, New York, 1986.
 
3
 
4
BIKSON, T. K., GUTEK, B. A., AND MANKIN, D. Implementing computerized procedures in office settings: Influences and outcomes. The Rand Corporation, R-3077-NSF, Oct. 1987.
 
5
BIKSON, T. K., STASZ, C., AND MANKIN, D. A. Computer-mediated work: Individual and organizational impact in one corporate headquarters. The Rand Corporation, R-3308-OTA, Nov. 1985.
 
6
BIKSON, T. K., EDEN, R., GILLOGLY, J., HAHM, W., PAYNE, J., AND SHAPIRO, N. How to use the task force microcomputer. The Rand Corporation, N-2670-MF, Sept. 1987.
 
7
 
8
FREEMAN, L. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40 (1976), 35-41.
 
9
 
10
HUFF, C., SPROULL, L., AND KIESLER, S. Computer communication and organizational commitment: Tracing the relationship in a city government. J. Applied Social Psychology, In press.
 
11
 
12
KLING, R., AND SCACCm, W. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers 71 (1982), 2-60.
 
13
KNOKEM, D., AND KUKLINSKI, J.H. Network Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1982.
 
14
MARKUS, M.L. Toward a 'critical mass' theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research 14, 5 (Oct. 1987), 491-511.
 
15
McEvoY, B., AND FREEMAN, L. UCINET: A Microcomputer Package for Network Analysis. University of California, Irvine, Calif., 1986.
 
16
PAVA, C. H.P. Managing New Office Technology. The Free Press, New York, 1983.
 
17
RICE, R. E. Mediated group communication. In The New Media: Communication, Research and Technology, R. E. Rice and Associates, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1984, pp. 129-154.
 
18
RICE, R. E., AND CASE, D. Computer-based messaging in the university: A description of use and utility. Journal of Communication 33, 1 (1983), 131-152.
 
19
ROGERS, E., AND KINCAID, D. L. Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research. Macmillan, New York, 1981.
 
20
STASZ, C., BIKSON, T. K., AND SHAPIRO, N.Z. Assessing the Forest Service's implementation of an agency-wide information system: An exploratory study. The Rand Corporation, N-2463- USFS, May 1986.
 
21
TAYLOR, J.C. Job design and quality of working life. In Technology and the Transformation of White Collar Work, R. Kraut, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, N.J., 1987, pp. 211-235.
 
22
TRIST, E. L. The sociotechnical perspective: The evolution of sociotechnical systems as a conceptual framework and as an action research program, in Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, Andrew H. Van de Ven and William F. Joyce, Eds. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1981, pp. 19-75.
 
23

CITED BY  16


REVIEW

"William Edward Mihalo : Reviewer"

Eveland and Bikson describe an interesting field experiment. They wanted to ascertain if the use of technology would affect the structure of a task group. They selected workers who were about to retire or had recently retired and assigned them r  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
J. D. Eveland: colleagues
T. K. Bikson: colleagues