ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: metric labeling and Markov random fields
Full text PdfPdf (183 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 49 ,  Issue 5  (September 2002) table of contents
Pages: 616 - 639  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Jon Kleinberg  Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Éva Tardos  Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 178,   Citation Count: 23
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/585265.585268
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a traditional classification problem, we wish to assign one of k labels (or classes) to each of n objects, in a way that is consistent with some observed data that we have about the problem. An active line of research in this area is concerned with classification when one has information about pairwise relationships among the objects to be classified; this issue is one of the principal motivations for the framework of Markov random fields, and it arises in areas such as image processing, biometry, and document analysis. In its most basic form, this style of analysis seeks to find a classification that optimizes a combinatorial function consisting of assignment costs---based on the individual choice of label we make for each object---and separation costs---based on the pair of choices we make for two "related" objects.We formulate a general classification problem of this type, the metric labeling problem; we show that it contains as special cases a number of standard classification frameworks, including several arising from the theory of Markov random fields. From the perspective of combinatorial optimization, our problem can be viewed as a substantial generalization of the multiway cut problem, and equivalent to a type of uncapacitated quadratic assignment problem.We provide the first nontrivial polynomial-time approximation algorithms for a general family of classification problems of this type. Our main result is an O(log k log log k)-approximation algorithm for the metric labeling problem, with respect to an arbitrary metric on a set of k labels, and an arbitrary weighted graph of relationships on a set of objects. For the special case in which the labels are endowed with the uniform metric---all distances are the same---our methods provide a 2-approximation algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
Besag, J. 1974. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 36.
 
4
Besag, J. 1986. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 48.
 
5
 
6
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., and Zabih, R. 1999. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision.
 
7
 
8
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., and Stone, C. J. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole.
9
10
 
11
Charikar, M., Chekuri, C., Goel, A., Guha, S., and Plotkin, S. 1998. Approximating arbitrary metrics by O(n log n) trees. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif.
 
12
Chellappa, R., and Jain, A. 1993. Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
 
13
 
14
Cunningham, W. H., and Tang, L. 1994. Optimal 3-terminal cuts and linear programming. In Proceedings of the MPS Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization.
 
15
 
16
Dietterich, T. G. 1997. Machine learning research: Four current directions. AI Mag. 18.
 
17
Dubes, R., and Jain, A. 1989. Random field models in image analysis. J. Appl. Stat. 16.
 
18
 
19
Ferrari, P., Frigessi, A., and de Sá, P. 1995. Fast approximate maximum a posteriori restoration of multi-color images. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 57.
 
20
Geman, S., and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 6.
 
21
Greig, D., Porteous, B., and Seheult, A. 1989. Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 48.
 
22
23
 
24
 
25
Kinderman, R., and Snell, J. 1980. Markov Random Fields and their Applications. AMS Press.
 
26
 
27
Pardalos, P., and Wolkowicz, H. 1994. Quadratic assignment and related problems. In DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 16.
 
28
Potts, R. 1952. Some generalized order-disorder transformations. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 48.
 
29
Queyranne, M. 1986. Performance ratio of polynomial heuristics for triangle inequality quadratic assignment problems. Oper. Res. Lett. 4.
 
30
 
31
Woods, J. W. 1972. Two-dimensional discrete Markovian fields. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 18.

CITED BY  23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jon Kleinberg: colleagues
Éva Tardos: colleagues