ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Discovering the representative of a search engine
Full text PdfPdf (99 KB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
McLean, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Poster session table of contents
Pages: 652 - 654  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-492-4
Authors
King-Lup Liu  DePaul University, Chicago, IL
Clement Yu  University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
Weiyi Meng  SUNY-Binghamton, Binghamton, NY
Sponsors
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 38,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/584792.584909
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Given a large number of search engines on the Internet, it is difficult for a person to determine which search engines could serve his/her information needs. A common solution is to construct a metasearch engine on top of the search engines. Upon receiving a user query, the metasearch engine sends it to those underlying search engines which are likely to return the desired documents for the query. The selection algorithm used by a metasearch engine to determine whether a search engine should be sent the query typically makes the decision based on the search-engine representative, which contains characteristic information about the database of a search engine. However, an underlying search engine may not be willing to provide the needed information to the metasearch engine. This paper shows that the needed information can be estimated from an uncooperative search engine with good accuracy. Two pieces of information which permit accurate search engine selection are the number of documents indexed by the search engine and the maximum weight of each term. In this paper, we present techniques for the estimation of these two pieces of information.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
W. Meng, K. Liu, C. Yu, W. Wu, and N. Rishe. Estimating the usefulness of search engines. In ICDE, March 1999.
5
 
6
S. Robertson, S. Walker, and M. Beaulieu. Okapi at trec-7: automatic ad hoc, filtering, vlc and interactive. In Overview of the Seventh Text Retrieval Conference, 1998.
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
11


Collaborative Colleagues:
King-Lup Liu: colleagues
Clement Yu: colleagues
Weiyi Meng: colleagues