| Removing redundancy and inconsistency in memory-based collaborative filtering |
| Full text |
Pdf
(328 KB)
|
| Source
|
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
archive
Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management
table of contents
McLean, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Web search 1
table of contents
Pages: 52 - 59
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-492-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
Kai Yu
|
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology & University of Munich, Germany
|
|
Xiaowei Xu
|
University of Arkansas at Little Rock , AK
|
|
Anton Schwaighofer
|
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology & Technical University of Graz, Austria
|
|
Volker Tresp
|
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, Munich, Germany
|
|
Hans-Peter Kriegel
|
University of Munich, Munich, Germany
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 89, Citation Count: 1
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The application range of memory-based collaborative filtering (CF) is limited due to CF's high memory consumption and long runtime. The approach presented in this paper removes redundant and inconsistent instances (users) from the data. This paper aims to distinguish informative instances (users) from large raw user preference database and thus alleviate the memory and runtime cost of the widely used memory-based collaborative filtering (CF) algorithm. Our work shows that a satisfactory accuracy can be achieved by using only a small portion of the original data set, thereby alleviating the storage and runtime cost of the CF algorithm. In our approach, we consider instance selection as the problem of selecting informative data that increase the We begin by discussing the instance selection problem in a general sense that is to increase a posteriori probability of the optimal model by selecting informative data. We evaluate the empirical performance of our approach PF on two real-world data sets and attain very promisingpositive experimental results. The dData size and the prediction time are significantly reduced, while the prediction accuracy is on a par with almost the same as the results achieved by using the complete database.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie, "Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering", In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
|
| |
4
|
D. Heckerman, "A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks", Technical Report MSR-TR-95-06, Microsoft Research, 1995.
|
| |
5
|
S. Hettich and S. D. Bay. The UCI KDD Archive {http://kdd.ics.uci.edu}. Irvine, CA: University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, (1999).
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
T Michell, "Machine Learning", McGraw Hill, 1997, pp169, 201--227
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Paul Resnick , Neophytos Iacovou , Mitesh Suchak , Peter Bergstrom , John Riedl, GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.175-186, October 22-26, 1994, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
[doi> 10.1145/192844.192905]
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
K. Yu, X. Xu, J. Tao, M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, "Instance Selection Techniques for Memory-Based Collaborative Filtering", Proc. 2nd SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining (SDM'02), 2002
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
|