ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the accuracy of MANET simulators
Full text PdfPdf (139 KB)
Source ACM Workshop On Principles Of Mobile Computing archive
Proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on Principles of mobile computing table of contents
Toulouse, France
SESSION: Mobility Models table of contents
Pages: 38 - 43  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-511-4
Authors
David Cavin  Distributed Systems Laboratory, Lausanne
Yoav Sasson  Distributed Systems Laboratory, Lausanne
André Schiper  Distributed Systems Laboratory, Lausanne
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 237,   Citation Count: 26
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/584490.584499
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The deployment of wireless applications or protocols in the context of Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANETs), often requires to step through a simulation phase. For the results of the simulation to be meaningful, it is important that the model on which is based the simulator matches as closely as possible the reality. In this paper we present the simulation results of a straightforward algorithm using several popular simulators (OPNET Modeler, NS-2, GloMoSim). The results tend to show that significant divergences exist between the simulators. This can be explained partly by the mismatching of the modelisation of each simulator and also by the different levels of detail provided to implement and configure the simulated scenarios.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
The REAL network simulator. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/skeshav/real/overview.html
 
2
L. Bajaj, M. Takai, R. Ahuja, K. Tang, R. Bagrodia, and M. Gerla. Glomosim: A scalable network simulation environment. Technical Report 990027, UCLA Computer Science Departmen, May 1999.
 
3
T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Dept. of Math and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.
 
4
I. W. Group. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. IEEE specification (http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11b-1999.pdf), Sep 1999. Work in Progress.
 
5
J. Heidemann, N. Bulusu, J. Elson, C. Intanagonwiwat and K. Lan and Y. Xu and W. Ye and D. Estrin, and R. Govindan. Effects of detail in wireless network simulation. In Proceedings of the SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, pages 3--11, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, January 2001. USC/Information Sciences Institute, Society for Computer Simulation.
6
 
7
D. Johnson and D. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In T. Imielinski and H. Korth, editors, Mobile Computing, chapter 5, pages 195--206. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Seattle, WA, 1996.
 
8
R. A. Meyer. PARSEC User Manual. UCLA Parralel Computing Laboratory, http://pcl.cs.ucla.edu.
 
9
The network simulator - NS-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.
 
10
OPNET Modeler. http://www.opnet.com/products/modeler/home.html.
 
11
T. C. M. Project. The CMU Monarch Project's wireless and mobility extensions to ns, Aug 1998. Available from http://www.monarch.cs.cmu.edu.
12
13

CITED BY  27

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Cavin: colleagues
Yoav Sasson: colleagues
André Schiper: colleagues