Real-time UML-based performance engineering to aid manager's decisions in multi-project planning

ABSTRACT

We investigate the usage of software performance engineering to aid the project manager in making sound, reliable predictions in software development, and in optimizing the utilization of resources (typically the people). We assimilate the project teams to the processing elements of a performance model, and their activities to the tasks to be accomplished within established time intervals. The proposed methodology uses as the manager's interface a subset of Real-Time UML, the recently adopted OMG standard specialized profile for addressing schedulability, performance and timeliness. To illustrate the approach, we model the case of a manager that must decide a release date for a product undergoing the testing phase. We show how, by means of basic performance analyses, different workflow assumptions can be explored and their consequent outcomes automatically derived: by looking at the analysis results, the manager can thus take an informed, more responsible decision.

REFERENCES

• 1: Paul S. Adler , Avi Mandelbaum , Viên Nguyen , Elizabeth Schwerer, From project to process management: an empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time, Management Science, v.41 n.3, p.458-484, March 1995 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.41.3.458]
• 2: Basanieri F., Bertolino A., Marchetti, E., and Mirandola, R. Automating the Management of Teams and Tasks in Software Multiprojects using UML and Queueing Networks. Proceeding of SNPD 02 (Madrid, Spain, June 26-28, 2002,) to appear.
• 3: Burr, A. and Owen, M. Statistical Method for Software Quality: Using Metrics for Process Improvement. Int. Thomson Computer Press, 1996.
• 4: Black, T., A., Fine, C., H., and Sachs, E., M., A Method for Systems Design Using Precedence Relationships: An Application to Automotive Brake Systems. M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, Working Paper no. 3208, 1990.
• 5: Vittorio Cortellessa , Raffaela Mirandola, Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams, Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Software and performance, p.58-70, September 2000, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada [doi>10.1145/350391.350406]
• 6: Dean, B., V., Project Management: Methods and Studies, North-Holland, Amsterdam 1985.
• 7: Evans, A., Kent, S., and Selic, B. (eds.). The Unified Modeling Language, Advancing the standard, Proceedings of Third International Conference, (York, UK, October 2000), LNCS 1939.
• 8: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language, Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools, October 2001
• 9: Imai, K., Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. Managing the New Product Development Process: How the Japanese Companies Learn an Unlearn in Clark, K., b., Hayes, R., H., Lorenz, C. (eds.). The uneasy Alliance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1985.
• 10: Cem Kaner , Jack L. Falk , Hung Quoc Nguyen, Testing Computer Software, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1999
• 11: V. Krishnan , Karl T. Ulrich, Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature, Management Science, v.47 n.1, p.1-21, January 2001 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.47.1.1.10668]
• 12: Philippe Kruchten, The Rational Unified Process: an introduction, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 13: V. G. Kulkarni , V. G. Adlakha, Markov and Markov-regenerative PERT networks, Operations Research, v.34 n.5, p.769-781, Sept.-Oct. 1986 [doi>10.1287/opre.34.5.769]
• 14: Stephen S. Lavenberg, Computer Performance Modeling Handbook, Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1983
• 15: Loch, C. H. Operations Management and Reengineering, European Management Journal (Vol. 16, 1998), 306 - 317.
• 16: Mirandola, R., and Cortellessa, V. UML based Performance Modeling of Distributed Systems in Proc. UML2000 (York UK, October 2000) LNCS 1939, Springer Verlag, 2000.
• 17: Rob Pooley, Software engineering and performance: a roadmap, Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, p.189-199, June 04-11, 2000, Limerick, Ireland [doi>10.1145/336512.336553]
• 18: Lawrence H. Putnam , Ware Myers, Measures for Excellence: Reliable Software on Time, within Budget, Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference, 1991
• 19: James Rumbaugh , Ivar Jacobson , Grady Booch, The Unified Modeling Language reference manual, Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, UK, 1998
• 20: Selic, B. Response to the OMG RFP for Schedulability, Performance and Time OMG document Ad/2001-06-14.
• 21: Connie U. Smith, Performance Engineering of Software Systems, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1990
• 22: Smith, C.U. and L. Williams. Performance Solutions, Addison-Wesley, 2001.
• 23: Smith, R., The Historical Roots of Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management (Vol. 43, 1997), 67-78.
• 24: Takeuchi, H., and Nonaka, I., The New Product Development Game. Harvard Business Review, 64, (1986), 137-146.
• 25: Wosp2000, Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Software and Performance, Ottawa, Canada, September 2000, ACM press.
• 26: UML Documentation version 1.3 Web Site. On-line at http://www.rational.com/uml/resources/documentation/index.jsps/
• 27: Gideon Weiss, Stochastic bounds on distributions of optimal value functions with applications to PERT, network flows and reliability, Operations Research, v.34 n.4, p.595-605, July-Aug. 1986 [doi>10.1287/opre.34.4.595]
• 28: http://www.microsoft.com/office/project/
• 29: http://www.iil.com/brochures/kerzner.htm

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
product release, project management, real-time UML, software performance engineering