ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the problem of generating common predecessors
Full text PdfPdf (231 KB)
Source Data Warehousing and OLAP archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM international workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP table of contents
McLean, Virginia, USA
Pages: 43 - 48  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-590-4
Authors
W. Lehner  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
W. Hümmer  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
L. Schlesinger  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
A. Bauer  University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/583890.583897
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Using common subexpressions to speed up a set of queries is a well known and long studied problem. However, due to the isolation requirement, operating a database in the classic transactional way does not offer many applications to exploit the benefits of simultaneously computing a set of queries. In the opposite, many applications can be identified in the context of data warehousing, e. g. optimizing the incremental maintenance process of multiple dependent materialized views or the generation of application specific data marts. In the paper we discuss the problem whether it is always advisable to generate the most complete common predecessor for a given set of queries or to restrict a predecessor to a subset of all possible base tables. As we will see, this question cannot be answered without having knowledge about the cardinality of queries after aggregation. However, if we can rely on this information, we can come up with an optimal predecessor for a common set of queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
18

Collaborative Colleagues:
W. Lehner: colleagues
W. Hümmer: colleagues
L. Schlesinger: colleagues
A. Bauer: colleagues