ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Solution of a three-body problem in quantum mechanics using sparse linear algebra on parallel computers
Full text PdfPdf (988 KB)
Source Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2001 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing (CDROM) table of contents
Denver, Colorado
Pages: 47 - 47  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-293-X
Authors
Mark Baertschy  JILA University of Colorado, CO
Xiaoye Li  National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
IEEE-CS\DATC : IEEE Computer Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/582034.582081
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A complete description of two outgoing electrons following an ionizing collision between a single electron and an atom or molecule has long stood as one of the unsolved fundamental problems in quantum collision theory. In this paper we describe our use of distributed memory parallel computers to calculate a fully converged wave function describing the electron-impact ionization of hydrogen. Our approach hinges on a transformation of the Schrödinger equation that simplifies the boundary conditions but requires solving very ill-conditioned systems of a few million complex, sparse linear equations. We developed a two-level iterative algorithm that requires repeated solution of sets of a few hundred thousand linear equations. These are solved directly by LU-factorization using a specially tuned, distributed memory parallel version of the sparse LU-factorization library SuperLU. In smaller cases, where direct solution is technically possible, our iterative algorithm still gives significant savings in time and memory despite lower megaflop rates.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
C. Ashcraft and R. Grimes. SPOOLES: An object-oriented sparse matrix library. In Proceedings of the Ninth SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing, 1999.
 
4
M. Baertschy, T. N. Rescigno, W. A. Isaacs, X. Li, and C. W. McCurdy. Electron-impact ionization of atomic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. A, 63:022712, 2001.
 
5
M. Baertschy, T. N. Rescigno, and C. W. McCurdy. Accurate amplitudes for electron-impact ionization. Phys. Rev. A, 64:022709, 2001.
 
6
M. Baertschy, T. N. Rescigno, C. W. McCurdy, J. Colgan, and M. S. Pindzola. Ejected-energy differential cross sections for the near threshold electron-impact ionization of hydrogen. Phys. Rev. A, 63:050701R, 2001.
 
7
R. Barrett, M. Berry, T. Chan, J. Demmel, J. Donato, J. Dongarra, V. Eijkhout, V. Pozo, C. Romine, and H. van der Vorst. Templates for the solution of linear systems: Building blocks for the iterative methods. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.
 
8
K. Bartschat, E. T. Hudson, M. P. Scott, P. G. Burke, and V. M. Burke. Convergent r matrix with pseudostates calculation for e-he collisions. Phys. Rev. A, 54:R998, 1996.
 
9
I. Bray. Close-coupling theory of ionization: Successes and failures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:4721, 1997.
 
10
I. Bray. Electron-impact ionization of atomic hydrogen from near threshold to high energies. J. Phys. B, 33, 2000.
 
11
 
12
A. Gupta. WSMP: Watson Sparse Matrix Package. Technical report, IBM research division, T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, 2000. http://www.cs.umn.edu/~agupta/wsmp.html.
 
13
W. A. Isaacs, M. Baertschy, C. W. McCurdy, and T. N. Rescigno. Doubly differential cross sections for the electron impact ionization of hydrogen. Phys. Rev. A, 63:030704R, 2001.
 
14
15
 
16
C. W. McCurdy, T. N. Rescigno, and D. A. Byrum. Approach to electron-impact ionization that avoids the three-body coulomb asymptotic form. Phys. Rev. A, 56:1958, 1997.
 
17
C. Pan and A. F. Starace. Angular distributions for near-threshold (e,2e) processes for h, he, and other rare-gas targets. Phys. Rev. A., 45:4588, 1992.
 
18
R. K. Peterkop. Opt. Spectrosc., 13:87, 1962.
 
19
M. S. Pindzola and F. J. Robicheaux. Time-dependent close-coupling calculations for the electron impact ionization of helium. Phys. Rev. A, 61:052707-1, 2000.
 
20
T. N. Rescigno, M. Baertschy, D. Byrum, and C. W. McCurdy. Making complex scaling work for long-range potentials. Phys. Rev. A, 55:4253, 1997.
 
21
T. N. Rescigno, M. Baertschy, W. A. Isaacs, and C. W. McCurdy. Collisional breakup in a quantum system of three charged particles. Science, 286:2474, December 24, 1999.
 
22
J. Röder, J. Rasch, K. Jung, C. T. Whelan, H. Ehrhardt, R. Allan, and H. Walters. Coulomb three-body effects in low-energy impact ionization of H(1s). Phys. Rev. A, 53:225, 1996.
 
23
M. R. H. Rudge and M. J. Seaton. Ionization of atomic hydrgoen by electron impact. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A, 283:262, 1965.
 
24
B. Simon. The definition of molecular resonance curves by the method of exterior complex scaling. Phys. Letts. A, 71:211, 1979.
 
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mark Baertschy: colleagues
Xiaoye Li: colleagues