ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An automatic design optimization tool and its application to computational fluid dynamics
Full text PdfPdf (274 KB)
Source Conference on High Performance Networking and Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2001 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing (CDROM) table of contents
Denver, Colorado
Pages: 25 - 25  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-293-X
Authors
David Abramson  Monash University, CLAYTON, Australia
Andrew Lewis  Griffith University, Nathan, Qld, Australia
Tom Peachey  Monash University, CLAYTON, Australia
Clive Fletcher  CANCES, University of New South Wales Australian Technology Park Eveleigh NSW Australia
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
IEEE-CS\DATC : IEEE Computer Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/582034.582059
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the Nimrod/O design optimization tool, and its application in computational fluid dynamics. Nimrod/O facilitates the use of an arbitrary computational model to drive an automatic optimization process. This means that the user can parameterise an arbitrary problem, and then ask the tool to compute the parameter values that minimize or maximise a design objective function. The paper describes the Nimrod/O system, and then discusses a case study in the evaluation of an aerofoil problem. The problem involves computing the shape and angle of attack of the aerofoil that maximises the lift to drag ratio. The results show that our general approach is extremely flexible and delivers better results than a program that was developed specifically for the problem. Moreover, it only took us a few hours to set up the tool for the new problem and required no software development.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Lewis, A., Abramson D., Sosic R., Giddy J., "Tool-based Parameterisation: An Application Perspective", Computational Techniques and Applications Conference, Melbourne, July 1995.
 
4
 
5
Eldred, M., Outka, D., Fulcher, C. and Bohnhoff, W. "Optimization of complex mechanics simulations with object-oriented software design.", Proceedings of the 36th IAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, pp 2406-2415, New Orleans, LA, April 1995
 
6
Czyzyk, J, Owen, J. and Wright, S. "Optimization on the Internet", OR/MS Today, October 1997.
 
7
Casanova, H. and Dongarra, J. "NetSolve: A Network Server for Solving Computational Science Problems", The International Journal of Supercomputing Applications and High Performance Computing, Vol 11, Number 3, pp 212-223, 1997.
8
 
9
McCorquodale, J., Parker, S., Davison de St. Germain, J. and Johnson, C., "The Utah Parallelism Infrastructure: A Performance Evaluation", 2001 High Performance Computing Symposium (HPC'01), Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference, April 22-26, 2001, Seattle, Washington (USA).
 
10
 
11
 
12
Gill, P.E., Murray, W. and Wright. M, "Practical Optimization". Academic Press, London, 1981.
 
13
Abramson, D, Lewis, A. and Peachy, T., "Nimrod/O: A Tool for Automatic Design Optimization", The 4th International Conference on Algorithms & Architectures for Parallel Processing (ICA3PP 2000), Hong Kong, 11-13 December 2000.
 
14
Abramson, D, Lewis, A. and Peachy, T. "Case Studies in Automatic Design Optimisation using the P-BFGS Algorithm", 2001 High Performance Computing Symposium (HPC'01), Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference, April 22-26, 2001, pp 104-109, Seattle, Washington (USA).
15
 
16
Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Globus: A Metacomputing Infrastructure Toolkit, International Journal of Supercomputer Applications, 11(2):115-128, 1997.
 
17
Litzkow, M., Livny, M. and Mutka, M.W., "Condor --- A Hunter of Idle Workstations", proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Distributed Computing Systems, pp 104-111, June 1988.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Nelder, J.A., and Mead, R.,"A simplex method for function minimization", Comput. J., 7, pp. 308-313, 1965.
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Poloni, G and Pediroda, V. "GA Coupled with Computationally Expensive Simulations: Tools to Improve Efficiency", Chapter 13, in "Genetic Algortihms and Evolution Strategy in Engineering and Computer Science", Edited by Quagliarella, Periaux, Poloni and Winter, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, ISBN 0 471 97710 1.
 
25
 
26
 
27
Spendley, W, Hext, G. R. and Himsworth, F. R. "Sequential applications of simplex designs in optimization and evolutionary operation", Technometrics, 4, pp 441-461, 1962.


Collaborative Colleagues:
David Abramson: colleagues
Andrew Lewis: colleagues
Tom Peachey: colleagues
Clive Fletcher: colleagues