ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Security attribute evaluation method: a cost-benefit approach
Full text PdfPdf (932 KB)
Source International Conference on Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Technical papers: Software evaluation table of contents
Pages: 232 - 240  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-472-X
Author
Shawn A. Butler  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
IEEE-CS\DATC : IEEE Computer Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 178,   Citation Count: 17
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/581339.581370
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Conducting cost-benefit analyses of architectural attributes such as security has always been difficult, because the benefits are difficult to assess. Specialists usually make security decisions, but program managers are left wondering whether their investment in security is well spent. This paper summarizes the results of using a cost-benefit analysis method called SAEM to compare alternative security designs in a financial and accounting information system. The case study presented in this paper starts with a multi-attribute risk assessment that results in a prioritized list of risks. Security specialists estimate countermeasure benefits and how the organization's risks are reduced. Using SAEM, security design alternatives are compared with the organization's current selection of security technologies to see if a more cost-effective solution is possible. The goal of using SAEM is to help information-system stakeholders decide whether their security investment is consistent with the expected risks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Butler, Shawn and Fischbeck, Paul. Multi-Attribute Risk Assessment. Technical Report CMU-CS-01-169, December 2001.
 
3
Clemons, Robert T. and Reilly, Terence. Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury, 2001.
 
4
 
5
 
6
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications 800-30:Risk Management Guide (DRAFT), June 2001.
 
7
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-14: Generally Accepted Principles and Practices for Securing Information Technology Systems. 1996.
 
8
Yoon, K. Paul and Hwang, Ching-Lai Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications, 1995.

CITED BY  17