| Security attribute evaluation method: a cost-benefit approach |
| Full text |
Pdf
(932 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Software Engineering
archive
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering
table of contents
Orlando, Florida
SESSION: Technical papers: Software evaluation
table of contents
Pages: 232 - 240
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-472-X
|
|
Author
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28, Downloads (12 Months): 178, Citation Count: 17
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Conducting cost-benefit analyses of architectural attributes such as security has always been difficult, because the benefits are difficult to assess. Specialists usually make security decisions, but program managers are left wondering whether their investment in security is well spent. This paper summarizes the results of using a cost-benefit analysis method called SAEM to compare alternative security designs in a financial and accounting information system. The case study presented in this paper starts with a multi-attribute risk assessment that results in a prioritized list of risks. Security specialists estimate countermeasure benefits and how the organization's risks are reduced. Using SAEM, security design alternatives are compared with the organization's current selection of security technologies to see if a more cost-effective solution is possible. The goal of using SAEM is to help information-system stakeholders decide whether their security investment is consistent with the expected risks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Butler, Shawn and Fischbeck, Paul. Multi-Attribute Risk Assessment. Technical Report CMU-CS-01-169, December 2001.
|
| |
3
|
Clemons, Robert T. and Reilly, Terence. Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury, 2001.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publications 800-30:Risk Management Guide (DRAFT), June 2001.
|
| |
7
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-14: Generally Accepted Principles and Practices for Securing Information Technology Systems. 1996.
|
| |
8
|
Yoon, K. Paul and Hwang, Ching-Lai Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publications, 1995.
|
CITED BY 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rinku Dewri , Nayot Poolsappasit , Indrajit Ray , Darrell Whitley, Optimal security hardening using multi-objective optimization on attack tree models of networks, Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, October 28-31, 2007, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
|
|
|
Yudistira Asnar , Paolo Giorgini , Paolo Ciancarini , Rocco Moretti , Maurizio Sebastianis , Nicola Zannone, An evaluation of business solutions in manufacturing enterprises, International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, v.3 n.3, p.305-329, December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huaqiang Wei , Jim Alves-Foss , Terrence Soule , Hugh Pforsich , Du Zhang , Deborah Frincke, A Layered Decision Model for cost-effective system security, International Journal of Information and Computer Security, v.2 n.3, p.297-324, October 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Bailey , Antonio Drommi , Jeffrey Ingalsbe , Nancy Mead , Dan Shoemaker, A Common Sense Way to Make the Business Case for Software Assurance, The EDP Audit, Control, and Security Newsletter, v.38 n.3, p.8-20, September 2008
|
|
|
|
|