ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Moderating effects of age, education, and tenure on the job satisfaction-job performance relationship
Full text PdfPdf (433 KB)
Source Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Management of information systems personnel table of contents
College park, Maryland, United States
Pages: 202 - 206  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-262-4
Author
C. K. Woodruff  School of Business Administration, Winthrop College, Rock Hill, SC
Sponsor
SIGCPR: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 62,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57216.57246
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

An exploratory investigation was conducted to clarify the role of age, education level attained, and tenure as potential moderators of the relationship of job satisfaction and job performance for information systems personnel. Participants in an empirical study included 202 individuals from twelve computer centers. No support was found for age, education level attained, and tenure as moderators. This lack of support extended beyond a summated measure of total job performance to each of the component performance measures: quantity of work, quality of work, job knowledge, job judgment, job initiative, adaptability, cooperation, and innovativeness. A small statistically significant relationship was found for these variables on job knowledge and job judgment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brayfield, A.H., and Crockett, W.H. "Employee Attitudes and Employee Performance," Psychological Bulletin, Volume 52, 1955, pp. 396-424.
 
2
Carlson, R.E. "Degree of Job Fit as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction," Personnel Psvcholoqv, Volume 22, 1969, pp. 159-170.
 
3
Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. A_p_plied Multi pl e Regression/Correl ati on Analysis for the Behavioral Science. s, Hillsdale, New Jersey- Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975.
 
4
Doll, R.E., and Gunderson, E.K.E. "Occupational Group as a Moderator of the Job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationship," Journal of Applied Psycholoqv, Volume 53, 1969, pp. 359-361.
 
5
Fisher, C.D. "On the Dubious Wisdom of Expecting Job Satisfaction to Correlate With Performance," Academy of Manaqement Review, Volume 5, 1980, pp. 607-612.
 
6
Inkson, J.H.K. "Self Esteem as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction," Journal of Applied Psvcholoq~, Volume 63, 1978, pp. 243-247.
 
7
Norris, D.R., and Niebuhr, R.E. "The Moderating Influence of Organization on the Job Satisfaction-Job Perfor4nance Relationship," Proceedinqs of the Allied Southern Business Association, 1982 Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 1982, pp. 221-223.
 
8
Norris, D.R., and Niebuhr, R.E. "Attributional Influences on the Job Performance-Job Satisfaction Relationship," Academy of ManaqemeDt Journal, Volume 27, 1984, pp. 424-431.
 
9
Porter, L.W., and Lawler, E.E., III. "Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1968.
 
10
Rhodes, S.R. "Age-Related Differences in Work Attitudes and Behavior: A Review and Conceptual Analysis," Psycholoqical Bulletin~ Volume 93, 1983, pp. 328-367.
 
11
Rosen, B., and Jerdee, T.H. "The Influence of Age Stereotypes on Managerial Decisions," Journal of Applied Psvcholoqv, Volume 61, 1976, pp. 428-432.
 
12
Saunders, D.R. "Moderator Variables in Prediction," Educational and Ps~choloqical Measurement, Volume 16, 1956, pp. 209-222.
 
13
Schnake, M.E. "A Multidimensional Analysis of the Relationship Between job Satisfaction and Job Performance, Proceedinqs of the Allied Southern Business Association, 1982 Annual Meeting, November 8-13, 1982, pp. 322-324.
 
14
Schwab, D.P., and Cummings, L.L. "Theories of Performance and Satisfaction: A Review," Industrial Relations, Volume 9, 1970, pp. 408-430.
 
15
Slocum, J.W. "Motivation in Managerial Levels: Relationships of Need Satisfaction to Job Performance," Journal of Applied p sycholoqv, Volume 55, 1971, pp. 312-316.
 
16
Steers, R.M. "Effects of Need for Achievement on the Job Performance-Job Attitude Relationship," Journal of Applied Psvcho}oq~, Volume 60, 1975, pp. 678-682.
 
17
Vroom, V.H. Work Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
 
18
Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., and Lofquist, L.H. Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, University of Minnesota Industrial Relations Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1967.
 
19
Zedeck, S. "Problems with the Use of Moderator Variables," Psychological Bulletin, Volume 76, 1971, pp. 295-310.