ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students
Full text PdfPdf (1.99 MB)
Source ACM SIGCSE Bulletin archive
Volume 33 ,  Issue 4  (December 2001) table of contents
COLUMN: ITiCSE 2001 working group reports table of contents
Pages: 125 - 180  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISSN:0097-8418
Authors
Michael McCracken  Georgia Institute of Technology
Vicki Almstrum  University of Texas at Austin
Danny Diaz  Georgia Institute of Technology
Mark Guzdial  Georgia Institute of Technology
Dianne Hagan  Monash University, Australia
Yifat Ben-David Kolikant  Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Cary Laxer  Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lynda Thomas  University of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK
Ian Utting  University of Kent, UK
Tadeusz Wilusz  Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 153,   Citation Count: 55
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/572139.572181
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In computer science, an expected outcome of a student's education is programming skill. This working group investigated the programming competency students have as they complete their first one or two courses in computer science. In order to explore options for assessing students, the working group developed a trial assessment of whether students can program. The underlying goal of this work was to initiate dialog in the Computer Science community on how to develop these types of assessments. Several universities participated in our trial assessment and the disappointing results suggest that many students do not know how to program at the conclusion of their introductory courses. For a combined sample of 216 students from four universities, the average score was 22.89 out of 110 points on the general evaluation criteria developed for this study. From this trial assessment we developed a framework of expectations for first-year courses and suggestions for further work to develop more comprehensive assessments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ACM & IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula 2001 (2001). Computing Curricula 2001, Ironman Draft. Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Available: http://www.acm.org/sigcse/cc2001 {2001, 5/16/01}.
 
2
 
3
BlueJ (2001). BlueJ, the Interactive Java Environment. Available: http://www.bluej.org. {24 July 2001}.
 
4
Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Advances in Assessment Models, Methods, and Practices. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
 
5
Linn, R. L., Baker. E. L., and Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), pp. 15-21.
6
 
7
Pea, R. (1986). Language independent conceptual bugs in novice programming. Educational Computing Research, 2(1), pp. 25-36.
 
8
Soloway, E., Ehrlich, K., Bonar, J., & Greenspan, J. (1982). What do novices know about programming? In A. Badre and B. Shneiderman (Eds) Directions in Human-Computer Interactions, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 27-54.
9
 
10
Wiedenbeck, S., Ramalingam, V., Sarasamma, S. and Corritore, C. L. (1999). A comparison of the comprehension of object-oriented and procedural programs by novice programmers. Interacting With Computers. 11(3), March, pp. 255-282.
11

CITED BY  55
Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael McCracken: colleagues
Vicki Almstrum: colleagues
Danny Diaz: colleagues
Mark Guzdial: colleagues
Dianne Hagan: colleagues
Yifat Ben-David Kolikant: colleagues
Cary Laxer: colleagues
Lynda Thomas: colleagues
Ian Utting: colleagues
Tadeusz Wilusz: colleagues