A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students

ABSTRACT

In computer science, an expected outcome of a student's education is programming skill. This working group investigated the programming competency students have as they complete their first one or two courses in computer science. In order to explore options for assessing students, the working group developed a trial assessment of whether students can program. The underlying goal of this work was to initiate dialog in the Computer Science community on how to develop these types of assessments. Several universities participated in our trial assessment and the disappointing results suggest that many students do not know how to program at the conclusion of their introductory courses. For a combined sample of 216 students from four universities, the average score was 22.89 out of 110 points on the general evaluation criteria developed for this study. From this trial assessment we developed a framework of expectations for first-year courses and suggestions for further work to develop more comprehensive assessments.

REFERENCES

• 1: ACM & IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula 2001 (2001). Computing Curricula 2001, Ironman Draft. Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Available: http://www.acm.org/sigcse/cc2001 {2001, 5/16/01}.
• 2: Kent Beck, Extreme programming explained: embrace change, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1999
• 3: BlueJ (2001). BlueJ, the Interactive Java Environment. Available: http://www.bluej.org. {24 July 2001}.
• 4: Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Advances in Assessment Models, Methods, and Practices. In D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
• 5: Linn, R. L., Baker. E. L., and Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), pp. 15-21.
• 6: Richard E. Mayer, The Psychology of How Novices Learn Computer Programming, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), v.13 n.1, p.121-141, March 1981 [doi>10.1145/356835.356841]
• 7: Pea, R. (1986). Language independent conceptual bugs in novice programming. Educational Computing Research, 2(1), pp. 25-36.
• 8: Soloway, E., Ehrlich, K., Bonar, J., & Greenspan, J. (1982). What do novices know about programming? In A. Badre and B. Shneiderman (Eds) Directions in Human-Computer Interactions, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 27-54.
• 9: James C. Spohrer , Elliot Soloway, Novice mistakes: are the folk wisdoms correct?, Communications of the ACM, v.29 n.7, p.624-632, July 1986 [doi>10.1145/6138.6145]
• 10: Wiedenbeck, S., Ramalingam, V., Sarasamma, S. and Corritore, C. L. (1999). A comparison of the comprehension of object-oriented and procedural programs by novice programmers. Interacting With Computers. 11(3), March, pp. 255-282.
• 11: Brenda Cantwell Wilson , Sharon Shrock, Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors, Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, p.184-188, February 2001, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Curriculum

General Terms:
Human Factors