ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Procurer usability requirements: negotiations in contract development
Full text PdfPdf (266 KB)
Source Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; Vol. 31 archive
Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction table of contents
Aarhus, Denmark
SESSION: Papers table of contents
Pages: 61 - 70  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-616-1
Author
Henrik Artman  Interaction and Presentation Lab and the Centre for User-Oriented Design Numerical Analysis and Computer Science Royal Institute of Technology 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
: Centre for Human-Machine Interaction
: IT University of Copenhagen
: Sveriges Tvarvetenskapliga Intresseforening For Manniska-Datorinteraktion
: Arhus Kommune
AIAS : Alexandra Instituttet A/S
: Arhus Amt
: Centre for Pervasive Computing
UAARHUS : University of Aarhus
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 56,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/572020.572029
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This article describes a case study that examined one procurer's reasoning about and work with usability-related issues as well as the contractor's response to those requirements. The aim of this study was to examine the procurer's power to direct the system development process according to user-centred principles and indeed to point out its responsibility to use that power. The study elucidated the procurer's and the contractor's differing views of usability. The results suggest that the project leaders from the two organisations examined in this study had differing views of usability and that both approached usability more from a business perspective than from a user perspective. Furthermore, we found that the procurer valued user-centred activities less for their results than for the opportunity they gave to come in contact with the user's point of view and then to visualize the requirements concretely. We conclude this article with an analysis of some contradictions within and between the two organisations from a socio-cultural point of view. We suggest some mundane but nevertheless important requirements that procurers should think of when contracting consultants.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Carlshamre, P. (2001). A Usability Perspective on Requirement Engineering. Doctorate Thesis no: 726. Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Sweden.
 
3
Clark, M., Heivert, J. (1999) Lönsamma IT---investeringar med funktionsupphandling. Lund: Studentlitteratur. {in Swedish}
 
4
Constantine, L.L., Lockwood, L.A.D. (1999) Software for Use. New York: Addison-Wesley.
 
5
 
6
Dahlgren, L., E., Lundgren, G., Stigberg, L. (2000). Öka nyttan av IT! Stockholm: Ekerlids förlag. {in Swedish}
 
7
 
8
 
9
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.
 
10
Forsgren, P. (1996). Management of Industrial IT Procurement, Doctoral Thesis. Industrial Control Systems, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
ISO 13407 (1999). Human-Centred Design Processes for Interactive Systems.
 
15
ISO 9241 -11 (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) --- Part 11: Guidance on Usability.
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

CITED BY  6