A placement examination for computer science II

ABSTRACT

Students enrolling in Computer Science II at Mississippi State University (MSU) have widely varying backgrounds. Some have taken the prerequisite course at MSU, some have transferred from community colleges offering the prerequisite, and some are new graduate students with undergraduate deficiencies. Proper placement of students in the introductory courses is necessary to give those students with little background in object-oriented software development an opportunity for success, while challenging students who may have had substantial programming experience elsewhere. The Department has developed and tested a placement examination. The examination helps students decide if they should enroll in an introductory course that assumes some previous programming experience without object-oriented software development, or if they should begin in Computer Science II that assumes knowledge of C++ with object-oriented design. The score on the placement exam demonstrated predictive power when trying to distinguish, coarsely, between those students who will probably pass the Computer Science II course and those students who are at risk of failing the course.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bridges, S., N. Miller, & G. Boggess. A Placement Examination in Computer Science. Computer Science Education 7, (1996), 21-34.
• 2: D. F. Butcher , W. A. Muth, Predicting performance in an introductory computer science course, Communications of the ACM, v.28 n.3, p.263-268, March 1985 [doi>10.1145/3166.3167]
• 3: Harriet G. Taylor , Luegina C. Mounfield, The effect of high school computer science, gender, and work on success in college computer science, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.21 n.1, p.195-198, Feb. 1989
• 4: Ted W. Goodman, Identifying students who may experience difficulty in an introductory computer science course, Proceedings of the 28th annual Southeast regional conference, p.182, April 1990 [doi>10.1145/98949.98988]
• 5: Dianne Hagan , Selby Markham, Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program?, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.32 n.3, p.25-28, Sept. 2000
• 6: Wall, D, Clapham, C, and Alderson, J. C. Evaluating a placement test. Language Testing 11, 3, (1994), 321-344.
• 7: Breland, H. M., Danos, D. O., Kahn, H. D., Kubota, M. Y., and Bonner, M. W. Performance versus objective testing and gender: An exploratory study of the advanced placement history examination. Journal of Educational Measurement 31, 4, (1994), 275-293.
• 8: Bers, T. H. and Smith, K. E. Assessing assessment programs: The theory and practice of examining reliability and validity of a writing placement test. Community College Review 18, 3, (1990), 17-27.
• 9: Kelley, D. Determining curricula and exam content in the advanced placement program: Implications for national standards. Education and Urban Society 26, 2, (1994), 172-184.
• 10: Christopher H. Nevison , Joe Kmoch , Robert E. Noonan , Tim Corica , Sarah Fix , David G. Kay, Changes in the advanced placement computer science course: case studies and C++ (panel), ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.27 n.1, p.374-375, March 1995