ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Task-oriented parsing - a diagnostic method to be used adaptive systems
Full text PdfPdf (798 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 241 - 247  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-201-14237-6
Author
H. U. Hoppe  Institute for Integrated Information & Pub. Systems, W. Germany
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57208
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In order to be able to show context-dependent responses to the user's actual needs, adaptive systems have to be provided with models of possible task contexts. Existing methods for the representation of tasks in HCI are insufficient for this purpose as they do not support task-oriented parsing (i.e. analysing the input stream in terms of higher level task units). This paper presents a Prolog implementation of a task-oriented parser (+ generator) based on a grammar notation called LEXITAS. As an application, an online coach for a UNIX-like file management system is described. Further applications, such as automated macro detection from given interaction protocols, are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Searle, J. R. (1984): Minds, Brains and Science. The 1984 Reith lectures. BBC London.
3
 
4
Benyon, D.; Innocent, P. & Murray, D. (1987): System Adaptivity and the Modelling of Stereotypes. Proc. INTERACT '87, Stuttgart. pp. 245- 253.
5
 
6
Reisner, P. (1981): Formal Grammar and Human Factors Design of an Interactive Graphic System. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol SE-712. pp. 229-240.
 
7
Payne, S. J. & Green, T. R. G. (1986): Task- Action Grammars - A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages. Human- Computer Interaction, Vol. 2. pp. 93-133
 
8
Kieras, D.E. & Poison, P. (1985): An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 22. pp. 365-394.
 
9
Doemer, D. (1976): Problemloesen als Informationsverarbeitung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
 
10
 
11
 
12
Kemke, C. (1987): Representation of Domain Knowledge in an Intelligent Help System. Proc. Interact '87, Stuttgart. pp. 215-220.
 
13
Hecking, M. (1987): How to Use Plan Recognition to Improve the Abilities of the Intelligent Help System SINIX Consultant. Proc. Interact '87, Stuttgart. pp. 657-662.
 
14
Kautz, H. A. & Allen, J. F. (1986): Generalized Plan Recognition. Proc. AAAI '86, Philadelphia (PA). Vol. 1: Science. pp. 32-37.
 
15
Kaplan, R. M. & Bresnan, J. (1982): Lexical- Functional Grammar- A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. In Bresnan, J. (ed.): The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.