ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface
Full text PdfPdf (670 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 213 - 218  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-201-14237-6
Authors
John P. Chin  Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD
Virginia A. Diehl  Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD
Kent L. Norman  Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 108,   Downloads (12 Months): 760,   Citation Count: 99
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57203
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This study is a part of a research effort to develop the Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS). Participants, 150 PC user group members, rated familiar software products. Two pairs of software categories were compared: 1) software that was liked and disliked, and 2) a standard command line system (CLS) and a menu driven application (MDA). The reliability of the questionnaire was high, Cronbach's alpha=.94. The overall reaction ratings yielded significantly higher ratings for liked software and MDA over disliked software and a CLS, respectively. Frequent and sophisticated PC users rated MDA more satisfying, powerful and flexible than CLS. Future applications of the QUIS on computers are discussed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29, 5, (May 1983), 530-545.
 
2
Coleman, W. D., Williges, R. C., & Wixon, D.R. Collecting detailed user evaluations of software interfaces. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society - 29th Annual Meeting - 1985, 240-244.
 
3
Chin, J. P., Norman, K. L., & S hneiderman, 13. Subjective user evaluation of CF PASCAL programming tools. Technical Report (CAR- TR-304), Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, 1987.
 
4
Gallagher, C.A. Perceptions of the value of a management information system. Academy cf Mangement Journal, 17, 1, (1974), 46-55.
5
 
6
Larcker, D. F. & Lessig, V.P. Perceived usefulness of information: A psychometric examination. Decision Science, 11, 1, (1980), 121-134.
 
7
Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, McGraw- Hill Book Company, New York, 11978.
8
9
 
10

CITED BY  100

Collaborative Colleagues:
John P. Chin: colleagues
Virginia A. Diehl: colleagues
Kent L. Norman: colleagues