ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Knowledge structuring and representation in requirement specification
Full text PdfPdf (186 KB)
Source SEKE; Vol. 27 archive
Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering table of contents
Ischia, Italy
SESSION: Requirements engineering table of contents
Pages: 143 - 150  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-556-4
Authors
Egidio Astesiano  DISI-Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, 16146 Genova, Italy
Gianna Reggio  DISI-Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 35, 16146 Genova, Italy
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/568760.568787
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

On the basis of some experience in the use of UML-based methods, we believe that a more refined and stringent structuring of the knowledge in the Requirement Specification may help the specification process and make easier the consistency checks among the various components. Thus we propose a way of structuring and representing the Requirement Specification artifacts that presents a number of novelties w.r.t. the best-known current methods. Our proposal is multiview, use case-driven and UML-based; thus also object-oriented. However, also benefitting of some earlier work, notably in the Structured Analysis, we take a rather abstract view, trying to avoid a preemptive decision on the classes structuring the system to build; that is achieved not only making a sharp distinction between business/domain modelling and the system, but also dealing with the system at the requirement level as a black box, providing only the minimal structure needed to express the interactions with the context.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
E. Astesiano and G. Reggio. Consistent Structuring of Requirements in the UML. Technical Report DISI-TR-02-27, DISI, Università di Genova, Italy, 2002. Available at ftp://ftp.disi.unige.it/person/ReggioG/AstesianoReggio02b.pdf.
 
2
 
3
M. Fowler and K. Scott. UML Distilled: Second Edition. Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
 
4
 
5
 
6
Rational. Rational Unified Process© for System Engineering SE 1.0. 2001.
 
7
R. Soley and OMG Staff Strategy Group. Model Driven Architecture. Available at ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/omg/00-11-05.pdf, 2000.
 
8
UML Revision Task Force. OMG UML Specification 1.3, 1999. Available at http://www.rational.com/media/uml/post.pdf.
 
9
Collaborative Colleagues:
Egidio Astesiano: colleagues
Gianna Reggio: colleagues