Towards an inspection technique for use case models

ABSTRACT

A use case model describes the functional requirements of a software system and is used as input to several activities in a software development project. The quality of the use case model therefore has an important impact on the quality of the resulting software product. Software inspection is regarded as one of the most efficient methods for verifying software documents. There are inspection techniques for most documents produced in a software development project, but no comprehensive inspection technique exists for use case models. This paper presents a taxonomy of typical defects in use case models and proposes a checklist-based inspection technique for detecting such defects. This inspection technique was evaluated in two studies with undergraduate students as subjects. The results from the evaluations indicate that inspections are useful for detecting defects in use case models and motivate further studies to improve the proposed inspection technique.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bente Anda , Hege Dreiem , Dag I. K. Sjøberg , Magne Jørgensen, Estimating Software Development Effort Based on Use Cases-Experiences from Industry, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on The Unified Modeling Language, Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools, p.487-502, October 01-05, 2001
• 2: Bente Anda , Dag I. K. Sjøberg , Magne Jørgensen, Quality and Understandability of Use Case Models, Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, p.402-428, June 18-22, 2001
• 3: Frank Armour , Granville Miller, Advanced use case modeling: software systems, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2001
• 4: Benjamin Cheng , Ross Jeffery, Comparing Inspection Strategies for Software Requirement Specifications, Proceedings of the 1996 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC '96), p.203, July 14-18, 1996
• 5: Alistair Cockburn, Writing Effective Use Cases, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2000
• 6: Khaled El Emam , Oliver Laitenberger, Evaluating Capture-Recapture Models with Two Inspectors, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.27 n.9, p.851-864, September 2001 [doi>10.1109/32.950319]
• 7: Fagan, M. E. Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 15(3), pp. 182-211, 1976.
• 8: Tom Gilb , Dorothy Graham , Susannah Finzi, Software Inspection, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1993
• 9: Hurlbut, R. R. A Survey of Approaches for Describing and Formalizing Use Cases. Technical Report: XPT-TR-97-03, Expertech, Ltd., 1997.
• 10: Use cases: requirements in context, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 2000
• 11: Oliver Laitenberger , Colin Atkinson , Maud Schlich , Khaled El Emam, An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in UML design documents, Journal of Systems and Software, v.53 n.2, p.183-204, Aug. 31, 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0164-1212(00)00052-2]
• 12: Lanubile.F. and Visaggio, G. Assessing defect detection methods for software requirements inspections through external replication, ISERN-96-01, January 1996.
• 13: J. Miller , M. Wood , M. Roper, Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists, Empirical Software Engineering, v.3 n.1, p.37-64, 1998 [doi>10.1023/A:1009735805377]
• 14: Adam A. Porter , Lawrence G. Votta, Jr. , Victor R. Basili, Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: A Replicated Experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, v.21 n.6, p.563-575, June 1995 [doi>10.1109/32.391380]
• 15: Kristian Sandahl , Ola Blomkvist , Joachim Karlsson , Christian Krysander , Mikael Lindvall , Niclas Ohlsson, An Extended Replication of an Experiment for AssessingMethods for Software Requirements Inspections, Empirical Software Engineering, v.3 n.4, p.327-354, December 1998 [doi>10.1023/A:1009724120285]
• 16: Geri Schneider , Jason P. Winters, Applying use cases: a practical guide, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1998
• 17: Forrest Shull , Ioana Rus , Victor Basili, How Perspective-Based Reading Can Improve Requirements Inspections, Computer, v.33 n.7, p.73-79, July 2000 [doi>10.1109/2.869376]
• 18: Shull, F., Travassos, G. H., Carver, J. and Basili, V. R. Evolving a Set of Techniques for OO Inspections. CS-TR-4070 and UMIACS-TR-, October 1999.
• 19: Ian Sommerville, Software engineering (5th ed.), Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, 1995
• 20: Thelin, T., Runeson, P. And Wohlin, C. An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading. WISE 2001.
• 21: Edward Yourdon, Structured walkthroughs: 4th edition, Yourdon Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989
• 22: www.mcbreen.ab.ca/papers/QAUseCases.html

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
inspections, use cases