| How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results |
| Full text |
Pdf
(358 KB)
|
Source
|
Communications of the ACM
archive
Volume 29 , Issue 3 (March 1986)
table of contents
The MIT Press scientific computation series
Pages: 218 - 221
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0001-0782
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 45, Downloads (12 Months): 196, Citation Count: 22
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Using the arithmetic mean to summarize normalized benchmark results leads to mistaken conclusions that can be avoided by using the preferred method: the geometric mean.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Aczel. J, Funcfional Equations. Academic Press. New York. 1966. p. 239. A comprehensive textbook on functional equations.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Patterson, D.A., and Sequin, C.H. A VLSI RISC. Computer 15. 9 (Sept. 1982). 6-21. The landmark paper formally introducing the RISC approach to computer architecture.
|
REVIEW
"Giuseppe Antonio Caruso : Reviewer"
In this paper, the authors demonstrate why the geometric mean is appropriate
for summarizing normalized benchmark results, and why the arithmetic mean,
when used in this context, leads to grossly incorrect conclusions.
In case one ass
more...
|