ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results
Full text PdfPdf (358 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 29 ,  Issue 3  (March 1986) table of contents
The MIT Press scientific computation series
Pages: 218 - 221  
Year of Publication: 1986
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
Philip J. Fleming  AT&T Information Systems, Naperville, IL
John J. Wallace  The Foxboro Company, Foxboro, MA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 45,   Downloads (12 Months): 196,   Citation Count: 22
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/5666.5673
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Using the arithmetic mean to summarize normalized benchmark results leads to mistaken conclusions that can be avoided by using the preferred method: the geometric mean.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aczel. J, Funcfional Equations. Academic Press. New York. 1966. p. 239. A comprehensive textbook on functional equations.
2
 
3
Patterson, D.A., and Sequin, C.H. A VLSI RISC. Computer 15. 9 (Sept. 1982). 6-21. The landmark paper formally introducing the RISC approach to computer architecture.

CITED BY  22


REVIEW

"Giuseppe Antonio Caruso : Reviewer"

In this paper, the authors demonstrate why the geometric mean is appropriate for summarizing normalized benchmark results, and why the arithmetic mean, when used in this context, leads to grossly incorrect conclusions. In case one ass  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Philip J. Fleming: colleagues
John J. Wallace: colleagues