ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Stylization and abstraction of photographs
Full text PdfPdf (2.47 MB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques table of contents
San Antonio, Texas
SESSION: Painting and non-photorealistic graphics table of contents
Pages: 769 - 776  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN ~ ISSN:0730-0301 , 1-58113-521-1
Also published in ...
Authors
Doug DeCarlo  Rutgers University
Anthony Santella  Rutgers University
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 25,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 60
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566570.566650
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Good information design depends on clarifying the meaningful structure in an image. We describe a computational approach to stylizing and abstracting photographs that explicitly responds to this design goal. Our system transforms images into a line-drawing style using bold edges and large regions of constant color. To do this, it represents images as a hierarchical structure of parts and boundaries computed using state-of-the-art computer vision. Our system identifies the meaningful elements of this structure using a model of human perception and a record of a user's eye movements in looking at the photo; the system renders a new image using transformations that preserve and highlight these visual elements. Our method thus represents a new alternative for non-photorealistic rendering both in its visual style, in its approach to visual form, and in its techniques for interaction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
BURT, P., AND ADELSON, E. 1983. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. IEEE Trans. on Communications 31, 4, 532-540.
 
4
CAMPBELL, F., AND ROBSON, J. 1968. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology 197, 551-566.
 
5
 
6
 
7
CURTIS, C. 1999. Non-photorealistic animation. In ACM SIGGRAPH 1999 Course Notes #17 (Section 9).
 
8
 
9
DUCHOWSKI, A., AND VERTEGAAL, R. 2000. Eye-based interaction in graphical systems: Theory and practice. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2000 Course Notes #5.
 
10
DUCHOWSKI, A. 2000. Acuity-matching resolution degradation through wavelet coefficient scaling. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9, 8 (Aug.), 1437-1440.
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
HANDFORD, M. 1987. Where's Waldo? Little, Brown and Company.
 
18
HENDERSON, J. M., AND HOLLINGWORTH, A. 1998. Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception, G. Underwood, Ed. Elsevier Science Ltd., 269-293.
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
HOFFMAN, D. D. 1998. Visual intelligence: how we create what we see. Norton.
 
24
JUST, M. A., AND CARPENTER, P. A. 1976. Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology 8, 441-480.
 
25
KELLY, D. 1984. Retinal inhomogenity: I. spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 74, 1, 107-113.
 
26
KOENDERINK, J. J., M. A. BOUMAN, A. B. D. M., AND SLAPPENDEL, S. 1978. Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. II. the far peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0-50). Journal of the Optical Society of America A 68, 6, 850-854.
 
27
KOENDERINK, J. J. 1984. The structure of images. Biological Cybernetics 50, 363-370.
 
28
KOENDERINK, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321-330.
 
29
 
30
LEYTON, M. 1992. Symmetry, causality, mind. MIT Press.
 
31
 
32
 
33
MACKWORTH, N., AND MORANDI, A. 1967. The gaze selects informative details within pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 2, 547-552.
 
34
MANNOS, J. L., AND SAKRISON, D. J. 1974. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 20, 4, 525-536.
 
35
 
36
 
37
38
 
39
 
40
REGAN, D. 2000. Human Perception of Objects: Early Visual Processing of Spatial Form Defined by Luminance, Color, Texture, Motion and Binocular Disparity. Sinauer.
 
41
ROVAMO, J., AND VIRSU, V. 1979. An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Experimental Brain Research 37, 495-510.
42
43
44
45
 
46
 
47
48
49
 
50
YARBUS, A. L. 1967. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press.
 
51
ZEKI, S. 1999. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford Univ. Press.

CITED BY  60

Collaborative Colleagues:
Doug DeCarlo: colleagues
Anthony Santella: colleagues