| Early evaluation techniques for low power binding |
| Full text |
Pdf
(226 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design
archive
Proceedings of the 2002 international symposium on Low power electronics and design
table of contents
Monterey, California, USA
SESSION: Session 6
table of contents
Pages: 160 - 165
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-475-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1, Downloads (12 Months): 20, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper presents effective metrics to evaluate the power dissipation of scheduled data flow graphs (DFGs). This enables early evaluation of schedules without performing the computationally expensive resource-binding step. Our metrics correlate heavily (as high as 0.95 and > 0.75 for most test cases) with power dissipation values obtained after resource binding and rescheduling for power optimization steps. An experimental flow that integrates path-based scheduling, power optimal binding and power driven iterative rescheduling stages is constructed. The flow integrates commercial tools like Synopsys, VSS and academic compilers like SUIF in a common optimization framework. Experimental results on DFGs from MediaBench suit also demonstrate the fact that metric evaluation is on average 42.6 times faster than performing optimal binding and iterative power improvement. Hence metric based evaluation enables fast design exploration at early stages.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Lars Kruse , Eike Schmidt , Gerd Jochens , Ansgar Stammermann , Arne Schulz , Enrico Macii , Wolfgang Nebel, Estimation of lower and upper bounds on the power consumption from scheduled data flow graphs, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, v.9 n.1, p.3-15, Feb. 2001
[doi> 10.1109/92.920813]
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Dasgupta A., and Karri R., High-Reliability, Low Energy Microarchitecture Synthesis, IEEE, TCAD, 1998.
|
| |
7
|
Hu T.C., Parallel Sequencing and Assembly Line Problems, Operations Research, No. 9, pp. 841--848, 1961.
|
| |
8
|
Paulin P., Knight J., Force Directed Scheduling for the Behavioral Synthesis of ASIC's, IEEE Transactions on CAD, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 661--679, 1989.
|
| |
9
|
Potasman R., Lis J., Nicolau A., Gajski D., Percolation Based Scheduling, Design Automation Conference, (DAC), 1990.
|
| |
10
|
Camposano R., Path-based Scheduling for Synthesis, IEEE Transactions on CAD, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 85--93, 1990.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Chunho Lee , Miodrag Potkonjak , William H. Mangione-Smith, MediaBench: a tool for evaluating and synthesizing multimedia and communicatons systems, Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture, p.330-335, December 01-03, 1997, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
|
| |
13
|
SUIF.<http://suif.stanford.edu>.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
|