ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Early evaluation techniques for low power binding
Full text PdfPdf (226 KB)
Source International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 2002 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Monterey, California, USA
SESSION: Session 6 table of contents
Pages: 160 - 165  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-475-4
Authors
Eren Kursun  University of California Los Angeles, CA
Ankur Srivastava  University of California Los Angeles, CA
Seda Ogrenci Memik  University of California Los Angeles, CA
Majid Sarrafzadeh  University of California Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 20,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566408.566450
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents effective metrics to evaluate the power dissipation of scheduled data flow graphs (DFGs). This enables early evaluation of schedules without performing the computationally expensive resource-binding step. Our metrics correlate heavily (as high as 0.95 and > 0.75 for most test cases) with power dissipation values obtained after resource binding and rescheduling for power optimization steps. An experimental flow that integrates path-based scheduling, power optimal binding and power driven iterative rescheduling stages is constructed. The flow integrates commercial tools like Synopsys, VSS and academic compilers like SUIF in a common optimization framework. Experimental results on DFGs from MediaBench suit also demonstrate the fact that metric evaluation is on average 42.6 times faster than performing optimal binding and iterative power improvement. Hence metric based evaluation enables fast design exploration at early stages.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
Dasgupta A., and Karri R., High-Reliability, Low Energy Microarchitecture Synthesis, IEEE, TCAD, 1998.
 
7
Hu T.C., Parallel Sequencing and Assembly Line Problems, Operations Research, No. 9, pp. 841--848, 1961.
 
8
Paulin P., Knight J., Force Directed Scheduling for the Behavioral Synthesis of ASIC's, IEEE Transactions on CAD, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 661--679, 1989.
 
9
Potasman R., Lis J., Nicolau A., Gajski D., Percolation Based Scheduling, Design Automation Conference, (DAC), 1990.
 
10
Camposano R., Path-based Scheduling for Synthesis, IEEE Transactions on CAD, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 85--93, 1990.
 
11
 
12
 
13
SUIF.<http://suif.stanford.edu>.
 
14
15
 
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
Eren Kursun: colleagues
Ankur Srivastava: colleagues
Seda Ogrenci Memik: colleagues
Majid Sarrafzadeh: colleagues