ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Smooth surface and triangular mesh: comparison of the area, the normals and the unfolding
Full text PdfPdf (402 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Saarbrücken, Germany
SESSION: Triangulation table of contents
Pages: 147 - 158  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-506-8
Authors
Jean-Marie Morvan  Institut Girard Desargues, Sophia-Antipolis, France
Boris Thibert  Universite Lyon, France
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566282.566306
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Replacing a smooth surface with a triangular mesh (i.e., a polyedron) "close to it" leads to some errors. The geometric properties of the triangular mesh can be very different from the geometric properties of the smooth surface, even if both surfaces are very close from one another. In this paper, we give examples of "developable" triangular meshes (the discrete Gaussian curvature is equal to 0 at each interior vertex) inscribed in a sphere (whose Gaussian curvature is equal to 1 at every point). However, if we make assumptions on the geometry of the triangular mesh, on the curvature of the smooth surface and on the Hausdorff distance between both surfaces, we get an estimate of several properties of the smooth surface in terms of the properties of the triangular mesh. In particular, we give explicit approximations of the normals and of the area of the smooth surface. Furthermore, if we suppose that the smooth surface is developable (i.e., "isometric" to a surface of the plane), we give an explicit approximation of the "unfolding" of this surface. Just notice that in some of our approximations, we do not suppose that the vertices of the triangular mesh belong to the smooth surface. Oddly, the upper bounds on the errors are better when triangles are right-angled (even if there are small angles): we do not need every angle of the triangular mesh to be quite large. We just need each triangle of the triangular mesh to contain at least one angle whose sine is large enough. Besides, approximations are better if the triangles of the triangular mesh are quite small where the smooth surface has a large curvature. Some proofs will be omitted.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
M. Berger and B. Gostiaux. Geometrie differentielle: varietes, courbes et surfaces. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, second edition, 1992
4
 
5
U. Brehm and W. Kuhnel. Smooth approximation of polyhedral surfaces regarding curvatures. Geom. Dedicata, 12(4):435--461, 1982
 
6
J. Cheeger, W. Muller, and R. Schrader. On the curvature of piecewise flat spaces. Comm. Math. Phys., 92(3):405--454, 1984
 
7
M. Desbrun, M. Meyer, P. Schröder, A. H. Barr. Discrete Differential-Geometry Operators In nd, submitted (2000). http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/desbrun00discrete.html
 
8
M. P. do Carmo. Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1976. Translated from the Portuguese
 
9
H. Federer. Curvature measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 93:418--491, 1959
 
10
J. H. G. Fu. Convergence of curvatures in secant approximations. J. Differential Geom., 37(1):177--190, 1993
 
11
S. Levy, T. Munzner, M. Phillips, Geomview. http://www.geomview.org/
 
12
B. Hamman. Curvature Approximation For Triangulated Surfaces, Computing Suppl. 8 (1993) 139-153
 
13
D. Milnor. Teoriya Morsa. Izdat. "Mir", Moscow, 1965
 
14
F. Morgan. Geometric Measure Theory Acad. Press, INC 1987
 
15
J.M. Morvan, B. Thibert. On The Approximation Of The Normal Vector Field Of A Smooth Surface With The Normals Of A Triangulated Mesh, submitted (2002)
 
16
J.M. Morvan, B. Thibert. Gauss Curvature And Unfolding Of A Smooth Surface, submitted (2001)
 
17
M. Spivak. A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. Vol. III. Publish or Perish Inc., Wilmington, Del., second edition, 1979
 
18
B. Thibert. Courbure De Gauss D'une Surface Et Depliabilite, Preprint of the Institut Girard Desargues UPRES-A 5028, Mars 2001/N°7
 
19
B. Thibert. Approximation Du Depliage Dune Surface, Preprint of the Institut Girard Desargues UPRES-A 5028, Mars 2001/N°4
 
20
B. Thibert, J.M. Morvan. On The Approximation Of A Smooth Surface With A Triangulated Mesh, submitted (2001)
 
21
F. E. Wolter. Cut Locus And Medial Axis In Global Shape Interrogation And Representation, MIT Design Laboratory Memorandum 92-2 and MIT Sea Grant Report, 1992


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jean-Marie Morvan: colleagues
Boris Thibert: colleagues