| Revisiting decomposition analysis of geometric constraint graphs |
| Full text |
Pdf
(217 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling
archive
Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications
table of contents
Saarbrücken, Germany
SESSION: Constraints
table of contents
Pages: 105 - 115
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-506-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 13, Citation Count: 3
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Geometric problems defined by constraints can be represented by geometric constraint graphs whose nodes are geometric elements and whose arcs represent geometric constraints. Reduction and decomposition are techniques commonly used to analyze geometric constraint graphs in geometric constraint solving. In this paper we first introduce the concept of deficit of a constraint graph. Then we give a new formalization of the decomposition algorithm due to Owen. This new formalization is based on preserving the deficit rather than on computing triconnected components of the graph and is simpler. Finally we apply tree decompositions to prove that the class of problems solved by the formalizations studied here and other formalizations reported in the literature is the same.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
I. Fudos and C.M. Hoffmann. Correctness proof of a geometric constraint solver. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 6(4):405--420, 1996
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
C.M. Hoffmann, A. Lomonosov, and M. Sitharam. Geometric constraint decomposition. In B. Bruderlin and D. Roller, editors, Geometric Constraint Solving and Applications, pages 171--195. Springer, Berlin, 1998
|
| |
8
|
J. E. Hopcroft and R. E. Tarjan. Dividing a graph into triconnected components. Technical report, Computer Science Department. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. USA, February 1974. New revision of TR 72--140
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
G. Laman. On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 4(4):331--340, October 1970
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
N. Mata. Solving incidence and tangency constraints in 2D. Technical Report LSI-97-3R, Department LSI, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 1997
|
| |
14
|
Gary L. Miller and Vijaya Ramachandran. A new graph triconnectivity algorithm and its parallelization. Combinatorica, 12:53--76, 1992
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
CITED BY 3
|
|
|
|
|
R. Joan-Arinyo , A. Soto-Riera , S. Vila-Marta , J. Vilaplana-Pastó, Transforming an under-constrained geometric constraint problem into a well-constrained one, Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, June 16-20, 2003, Seattle, Washington, USA
|
|
|
|
|