ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Revisiting decomposition analysis of geometric constraint graphs
Full text PdfPdf (217 KB)
Source ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling archive
Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications table of contents
Saarbrücken, Germany
SESSION: Constraints table of contents
Pages: 105 - 115  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-506-8
Authors
R. Joan-Arinyo  Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
A. Soto-Riera  Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
S. Vila-Marta  Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
J. Vilaplana-Pasto  Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566282.566300
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Geometric problems defined by constraints can be represented by geometric constraint graphs whose nodes are geometric elements and whose arcs represent geometric constraints. Reduction and decomposition are techniques commonly used to analyze geometric constraint graphs in geometric constraint solving. In this paper we first introduce the concept of deficit of a constraint graph. Then we give a new formalization of the decomposition algorithm due to Owen. This new formalization is based on preserving the deficit rather than on computing triconnected components of the graph and is simpler. Finally we apply tree decompositions to prove that the class of problems solved by the formalizations studied here and other formalizations reported in the literature is the same.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
I. Fudos and C.M. Hoffmann. Correctness proof of a geometric constraint solver. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 6(4):405--420, 1996
6
 
7
C.M. Hoffmann, A. Lomonosov, and M. Sitharam. Geometric constraint decomposition. In B. Bruderlin and D. Roller, editors, Geometric Constraint Solving and Applications, pages 171--195. Springer, Berlin, 1998
 
8
J. E. Hopcroft and R. E. Tarjan. Dividing a graph into triconnected components. Technical report, Computer Science Department. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. USA, February 1974. New revision of TR 72--140
9
 
10
 
11
G. Laman. On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 4(4):331--340, October 1970
 
12
 
13
N. Mata. Solving incidence and tangency constraints in 2D. Technical Report LSI-97-3R, Department LSI, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, 1997
 
14
Gary L. Miller and Vijaya Ramachandran. A new graph triconnectivity algorithm and its parallelization. Combinatorica, 12:53--76, 1992
15
 
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
R. Joan-Arinyo: colleagues
A. Soto-Riera: colleagues
S. Vila-Marta: colleagues
J. Vilaplana-Pasto: colleagues