|
ABSTRACT
A basic idea of geometric constraint solving is to decompose the constraint problem into smaller ones according to some basic configurations. In this paper, we find all spatial basic configurations involving points, lines, and planes containing up to six geometric primitives in an automated way. Many of these basic configurations still resist effective analytical solutions. We propose the locus intersection method for geometric constraint solving, which is used to solve all these basic configurations.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
X. Chen and C. Hoffmann, On Editability of Feature Based Design, CAD 27, 905--914, 1995
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
X.-S. Gao and S. C. Chou, Solving Geometric Constraint Systems I. A Global Propagation Approach, Computer Aided Design, 30(1), 47--54, 1998
|
| |
5
|
X.-S. Gao and S. C. Chou, Solving Geometric Constraint Systems II. A Symbolic Approach and Decision of Rc-constructibility, Computer-Aided Design, 30(2), 115--122, 1998
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
X.-S. Gao, K. Jiang, and C.-C. Zhu, Geometric Constraint Solving with Conics and Linkages, accepted by Computer Aided Design
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
R. Joan-Arinyo and A. Soto, A Correct Rule-Based Geometric Constraint Solver, Computers and Graphics, 21(5), 599--609, 1997
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
(MATH) C. Hoffmann and P.J. Vermeer, Geometric Constraint Solving in R2 and R3, in Computing in Euclidean Geometry, D.Z.Du and F.Huang (eds), pp. 266--298, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995
|
| |
14
|
C. M. Hoffmann, A. Lomonosov and M. Sitharam, Finding Solvable Subsets of Constraint Graphs, in LNCS, NO.1330, pp.163--197, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1997
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
G. A. Kramer, Solving Geometric Constraints Systems: A Case Study in Kinematics, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1992
|
| |
17
|
K. Kondo, Algebraic Method for Manipulation of Dimensional Relationships in Geometric Models, Computer Aided Design, 24(3), 141--147, 1992
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
R. S. Latham and A. E. Middleditch, Connectivity Analysis: a Tool for Processing Geometric Constraints, Computer Aided Design, 28(11), 917--928, 1994
|
| |
20
|
J. Y. Lee and K. Kim, Geometric Reasoning for Knowledge-Based Design Using Graph Representation, Computer-Aided Design, 28(10), 831--841, 1998
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
D. Michelucci, Using Cayley-Menger Determinants,undated world-wide-web document, www.emse.fr/~micheluc/MENGER/
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
G. Sunde, Specification of Shape by Dimension and Other Geometric Constraints, Geometric Modeling for CAD Application, pp.199--213, North-Holland, 1998
|
| |
25
|
A. Verroust, F. Schonek and D. Roller, Rule-Oriented Method for Parameterized Computer-Aided Design, Computer Aided Design, 24(10), 531--540, 1992
|
| |
26
|
|
|